Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1299–1306. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1129

Population growth rate as a basis for ecological risk assessment of toxic chemicals.

Valery E Forbes 1, Peter Calow 1
PMCID: PMC1693029  PMID: 12396520

Abstract

Assessing the ecological risks of toxic chemicals is most often based on individual-level responses such as survival, reproduction or growth. Such an approach raises the following questions with regard to translating these measured effects into likely impacts on natural populations. (i) To what extent do individual-level variables underestimate or overestimate population-level responses? (ii) How do toxicant-caused changes in individual-level variables translate into changes in population dynamics for species with different life cycles? (iii) To what extent are these relationships complicated by population-density effects? These issues go to the heart of the ecological relevance of ecotoxicology and we have addressed them using the population growth rate as an integrating concept. Our analysis indicates that although the most sensitive individual-level variables are likely to be equally or more sensitive to increasing concentrations of toxic chemicals than population growth rate, they are difficult to identify a priori and, even if they could be identified, integrating impacts on key life-cycle variables via population growth rate analysis is nevertheless a more robust approach for assessing the ecological risks of chemicals. Populations living under density-dependent control may respond differently to toxic chemicals than exponentially growing populations, and greater care needs to be given to incorporating realistic density conditions (either experimentally or by simulation) into ecotoxicological test designs. It is impractical to expect full life-table studies, which record changes in survival, fecundity and development at defined intervals through the life cycle of organisms under specified conditions, for all relevant species, so we argue that population growth rate analysis should be used to provide guidance for a more pragmatic and ecologically sound approach to ecological risk assessment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (187.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chandini T. Effects of different food (Chlorella) concentrations on the chronic toxicity of cadmium to survivorship, growth and reproduction of Echinisca triserialis (Crustacea: Cladocera). Environ Pollut. 1988;54(2):139–154. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Forbes V. E., Calow P., Sibly R. M. Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment? Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Feb;20(2):442–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liess Matthias. Population response to toxicants is altered by intraspecific interaction. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002 Jan;21(1):138–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sutherland William J., Norris Ken. Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1273–1284. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES