Abstract
Conservation biologists often wish to predict how vertebrate populations will respond to local or global changes in conditions such as those resulting from sea-level rise, deforestation, exploitation, genetically modified crops, global warming, human disturbance or from conservation activities. Predicting the consequences of such changes almost always requires understanding the population growth rate and the density dependence. Traditional means of directly measuring density dependence are often extremely difficult and have the problem that if the environment changes then it is necessary to remeasure the density dependence. We describe an alternative approach that does not require such long datasets and can be used to predict the density dependence under novel conditions. Game theory can be used to describe behavioural decisions that individuals make in response to interference, prey depletion, territorial behaviour or social dominance, and the resultant fitness consequences. It is then possible to predict how survival or reproductive output changes with population size. From this we can then make predictions about the responses of populations to environmental changes. We will illustrate how this can be applied to a range of species and a range of applied problems.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (173.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bulmer M. G. The statistical analysis of density dependence. Biometrics. 1975 Dec;31(4):901–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulson T., Catchpole E. A., Albon S. D., Morgan B. J., Pemberton J. M., Clutton-Brock T. H., Crawley M. J., Grenfell B. T. Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1528–1531. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5521.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gill J. A., Norris K., Potts P. M., Gunnarsson T. G., Atkinson P. W., Sutherland W. J. The buffer effect and large-scale population regulation in migratory birds. Nature. 2001 Jul 26;412(6845):436–438. doi: 10.1038/35086568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palta M., Sadek M., Barnet J. H., Evans M., Weinstein M. R., McGuinness G., Peters M. E., Gabbert D., Fryback D., Farrell P. Evaluation of criteria for chronic lung disease in surviving very low birth weight infants. Newborn Lung Project. J Pediatr. 1998 Jan;132(1):57–63. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70485-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pen I, I, Weissing FJ. Optimal Floating and Queuing Strategies: The Logic of Territory Choice. Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):512–526. doi: 10.1086/303338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sibly Richard M., Hone Jim. Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1153–1170. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith C., Reynolds J. D., Sutherland W. J. Population consequences of reproductive decisions. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 7;267(1450):1327–1334. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):401–405. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01684-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutherland W. J., Watkinson A. R. Policy making within ecological uncertainty: lessons from badgers and GM crops. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):261–263. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]