Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1285–1298. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1128

Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail.

T H Clutton-Brock 1, T Coulson 1
PMCID: PMC1693035  PMID: 12396519

Abstract

Attempts to relate species differences in population dynamics to variation in life histories rely on the assumption that the causes of contrasts in demography are sufficiently simple to be derived from first principles. Here, we investigate the causes of contrasts in dynamics between two ungulate populations on Hebridean islands (red deer and Soay sheep) and show that differences in stability, as well as in the effects of variation in density and climate, are related to differences in timing of reproduction relative to seasonal variation in resource abundance. In both populations, attempts to predict changes in population size sufficiently accurately for the results to be useful for management purposes require a knowledge of the responses of different age and sex categories to changes in density and climate, as well as of population structure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (389.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Coulson T. N., Milner-Gulland E. J., Thomson D., Armstrong H. M. Sex differences in emigration and mortality affect optimal management of deer populations. Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):633–637. doi: 10.1038/415633a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clutton-Brock T. H., Rose K. E., Guinness F. E. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1509–1516. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coltman D. W., Bancroft D. R., Robertson A., Smith J. A., Clutton-Brock T. H., Pemberton J. M. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol Ecol. 1999 Jul;8(7):1199–1209. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coltman D. W., Smith J. A., Bancroft D. R., Pilkington J., MacColl A. D., Clutton-Brock T. H., Pemberton J. M. Density-dependent variation in lifetime breeding success and natural and sexual selection in Soay rams. Am Nat. 1999 Dec;154(6):730–746. doi: 10.1086/303274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coulson T., Catchpole E. A., Albon S. D., Morgan B. J., Pemberton J. M., Clutton-Brock T. H., Crawley M. J., Grenfell B. T. Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1528–1531. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5521.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulson T., Milner-Gulland E. J., Clutton-Brock T. The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 7;267(1454):1771–1779. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grenfell B. T., Price O. F., Albon S. D., Clutton-Brock T. H. Overcompensation and population cycles in an ungulate. Nature. 1992 Feb 27;355(6363):823–826. doi: 10.1038/355823a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kruuk L. E., Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Pemberton J. M., Guinness F. E. Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):459–461. doi: 10.1038/20917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pemberton J. M., Smith J. A., Coulson T. N., Marshall T. C., Slate J., Paterson S., Albon S. D., Clutton-Brock T. H. The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in small island populations: large mammals in the Hebrides. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Jun 29;351(1341):745–752. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peterson R. O., Page R. E., Dodge K. M. Wolves, moose, and the allometry of population cycles. Science. 1984 Jun 22;224(4655):1350–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.224.4655.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES