Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1221–1231. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1123

Complex numerical responses to top-down and bottom-up processes in vertebrate populations.

A R E Sinclair 1, Charles J Krebs 1
PMCID: PMC1693037  PMID: 12396514

Abstract

Population growth rate is determined in all vertebrate populations by food supplies, and we postulate bottom-up control as the universal primary standard. But this primary control system can be overridden by three secondary controls: top-down processes from predators, social interactions within the species and disturbances. Different combinations of these processes affect population growth rates in different ways. Thus, some relationships between growth rate and density can be hyperbolic or even have multiple nodes. We illustrate some of these in marsupial, ungulate and rabbit populations. Complex interactions between food, predators, environmental disturbance and social behaviour produce the myriad observations of population growth in nature, and we need to develop generalizations to classify populations. Different animal groups differ in the combination of these four processes that affect them, in their growth rates and in their vulnerability to extinction. Because conservation and management of populations depend critically on what factors drive population growth, we need to develop universal generalizations that will relieve us from the need to study every single population before we can make recommendations for management.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (185.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fujiwara M., Caswell H. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature. 2001 Nov 29;414(6863):537–541. doi: 10.1038/35107054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Higgins SI, Pickett ST, Bond WJ. Predicting extinction risks for plants: environmental stochasticity can save declining populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Dec 1;15(12):516–520. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01993-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Saether Bernt-Erik, Engen Steinar. Pattern of variation in avian population growth rates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1185–1195. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scheffer M., Carpenter S., Foley J. A., Folke C., Walker B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):591–596. doi: 10.1038/35098000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sibly Richard M., Hone Jim. Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1153–1170. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith V. H. Low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios favor dominance by blue-green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science. 1983 Aug 12;221(4611):669–671. doi: 10.1126/science.221.4611.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):401–405. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01684-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES