Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Feb 28;358(1430):387–392. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1204

Disentangling weak coherence and executive dysfunction: planning drawing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Rhonda Booth 1, Rebecca Charlton 1, Claire Hughes 1, Francesca Happé 1
PMCID: PMC1693126  PMID: 12639335

Abstract

A tendency to focus on details at the expense of configural information, 'weak coherence', has been proposed as a cognitive style in autism. In the present study we tested whether weak coherence might be the result of executive dysfunction, by testing clinical groups known to show deficits on tests of executive control. Boys with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were compared with age- and intelligence quotient (IQ)-matched boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and typically developing (TD) boys, on a drawing task requiring planning for the inclusion of a new element. Weak coherence was measured through analysis of drawing style. In line with the predictions made, the ASD group was more detail-focused in their drawings than were either ADHD or TD boys. The ASD and ADHD groups both showed planning impairments, which were more severe in the former group. Poor planning did not, however, predict detail-focus, and scores on the two aspects of the task were unrelated in the clinical groups. These findings indicate that weak coherence may indeed be a cognitive style specific to autism and unrelated to cognitive deficits in frontal functions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fein D., Lucci D., Waterhouse L. Fragmented drawings in autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1990 Jun;20(2):263–269. doi: 10.1007/BF02284723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jarrold C., Butler D. W., Cottington E. M., Jimenez F. Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Dev Psychol. 2000 Jan;36(1):126–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mottron L., Belleville S. A study of perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain Cogn. 1993 Nov;23(2):279–309. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mottron L., Belleville S., Ménard E. Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):743–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ozonoff S., Jensen J. Brief report: specific executive function profiles in three neurodevelopmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Apr;29(2):171–177. doi: 10.1023/a:1023052913110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ozonoff S., Pennington B. F., Rogers S. J. Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: relationship to theory of mind. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1991 Nov;32(7):1081–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Plaisted K., Swettenham J., Rees L. Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):733–742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sergeant Joseph A., Geurts Hilde, Oosterlaan Jaap. How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Behav Brain Res. 2002 Mar 10;130(1-2):3–28. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00430-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shah A., Frith U. An islet of ability in autistic children: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1983 Oct;24(4):613–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Snyder A. W., Thomas M. Autistic artists give clues to cognition. Perception. 1997;26(1):93–96. doi: 10.1068/p260093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES