Abstract
This paper reviews a recent set of behavioural studies that examine the scope and nature of the representational system underlying theory-of-mind development. Studies with typically developing infants, adults and children with autism all converge on the claim that there is a specialized input system that uses not only morphological cues, but also behavioural cues to categorize novel objects as agents. Evidence is reviewed in which 12- to 15-month-old infants treat certain non-human objects as if they have perceptual/attentional abilities, communicative abilities and goal-directed behaviour. They will follow the attentional orientation of an amorphously shaped novel object if it interacts contingently with them or with another person. They also seem to use a novel object's environmentally directed behaviour to determine its perceptual/attentional orientation and object-oriented goals. Results from adults and children with autism are strikingly similar, despite adults' contradictory beliefs about the objects in question and the failure of children with autism to ultimately develop more advanced theory-of-mind reasoning. The implications for a general theory-of-mind development are discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (187.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A. M., Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Celani Giorgio. Human beings, animals and inanimate objects: what do people with autism like? Autism. 2002 Mar;6(1):93–102. doi: 10.1177/1362361302006001007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corkum V., Moore C. The origins of joint visual attention in infants. Dev Psychol. 1998 Jan;34(1):28–38. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Field T. M., Woodson R., Greenberg R., Cohen D. Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science. 1982 Oct 8;218(4568):179–181. doi: 10.1126/science.7123230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SC. The recognition of mentalistic agents in infancy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):22–28. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01414-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Legerstee M. The role of person and object in eliciting early imitation. J Exp Child Psychol. 1991 Jun;51(3):423–433. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(91)90086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lempers J. D. Young children's production and comprehension of nonverbal deictic behaviors. J Genet Psychol. 1979 Sep;135(1ST):93–102. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1979.10533420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meltzoff A. N., Moore M. K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.198.4312.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meltzoff A. N., Moore M. K. Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Dev. 1983 Jun;54(3):702–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton J., Johnson M. H. CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychol Rev. 1991 Apr;98(2):164–181. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moses L. J., Baldwin D. A., Rosicky J. G., Tidball G. Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):718–735. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Premack D. The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition. 1990 Jul;36(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90051-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Repacholi B. M., Gopnik A. Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Dev Psychol. 1997 Jan;33(1):12–21. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.1.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ricard M., Allard L. The reaction of 9- to 10-month-old infants to an unfamiliar animal. J Genet Psychol. 1993 Mar;154(1):5–16. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1993.9914716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scaife M., Bruner J. S. The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature. 1975 Jan 24;253(5489):265–266. doi: 10.1038/253265a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Aug;4(8):299–309. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01506-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodward A. L. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition. 1998 Nov;69(1):1–34. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]