Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):459–473. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1218

Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.

Uta Frith 1, Christopher D Frith 1
PMCID: PMC1693139  PMID: 12689373

Abstract

The mentalizing (theory of mind) system of the brain is probably in operation from ca. 18 months of age, allowing implicit attribution of intentions and other mental states. Between the ages of 4 and 6 years explicit mentalizing becomes possible, and from this age children are able to explain the misleading reasons that have given rise to a false belief. Neuroimaging studies of mentalizing have so far only been carried out in adults. They reveal a system with three components consistently activated during both implicit and explicit mentalizing tasks: medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), temporal poles and posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). The functions of these components can be elucidated, to some extent, from their role in other tasks used in neuroimaging studies. Thus, the MPFC region is probably the basis of the decoupling mechanism that distinguishes mental state representations from physical state representations; the STS region is probably the basis of the detection of agency, and the temporal poles might be involved in access to social knowledge in the form of scripts. The activation of these components in concert appears to be critical to mentalizing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (477.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):267–278. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allman J. M., Hakeem A., Erwin J. M., Nimchinsky E., Hof P. The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 May;935:107–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachevalier J., Meunier M., Lu M. X., Ungerleider L. G. Thalamic and temporal cortex input to medial prefrontal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jul;115(3):430–444. doi: 10.1007/pl00005713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barch D. M., Braver T. S., Akbudak E., Conturo T., Ollinger J., Snyder A. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):837–848. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.9.837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes C. L., Pandya D. N. Efferent cortical connections of multimodal cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1992 Apr 8;318(2):222–244. doi: 10.1002/cne.903180207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A. M., Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):37–46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertenthal B. I., Proffitt D. R., Cutting J. E. Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Apr;37(2):213–230. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berthoz S., Armony J. L., Blair R. J. R., Dolan R. J. An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. Brain. 2002 Aug;125(Pt 8):1696–1708. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D. M., Frith C. D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat Neurosci. 1998 Nov;1(7):635–640. doi: 10.1038/2870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonda E., Petrides M., Ostry D., Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci. 1996 Jun 1;16(11):3737–3744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-11-03737.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bottini G., Corcoran R., Sterzi R., Paulesu E., Schenone P., Scarpa P., Frackowiak R. S., Frith C. D. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain. 1994 Dec;117(Pt 6):1241–1253. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Botvinick M., Nystrom L. E., Fissell K., Carter C. S., Cohen J. D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):179–181. doi: 10.1038/46035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunet E., Sarfati Y., Hardy-Baylé M. C., Decety J. A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage. 2000 Feb;11(2):157–166. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):215–222. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Calvert G. A., Campbell R., Brammer M. J. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr Biol. 2000 Jun 1;10(11):649–657. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00513-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell R., MacSweeney M., Surguladze S., Calvert G., McGuire P., Suckling J., Brammer M. J., David A. S. Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Oct;12(2):233–243. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00054-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Caron A. J., Caron R., Roberts J., Brooks R. Infant sensitivity to deviations in dynamic facial-vocal displays: the role of eye regard. Dev Psychol. 1997 Sep;33(5):802–813. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.5.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Castelli F., Happé F., Frith U., Frith C. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage. 2000 Sep;12(3):314–325. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan D., Fox N. C., Scahill R. I., Crum W. R., Whitwell J. L., Leschziner G., Rossor A. M., Stevens J. M., Cipolotti L., Rossor M. N. Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2001 Apr;49(4):433–442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chao L. L., Haxby J. V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Oct;2(10):913–919. doi: 10.1038/13217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clayton P. E., Gill M. S., Hall C. M., Tillmann V., Whatmore A. J., Price D. A. Serum leptin through childhood and adolescence. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997 Jun;46(6):727–733. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.2081026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Corbetta M., Kincade J. M., Ollinger J. M., McAvoy M. P., Shulman G. L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):292–297. doi: 10.1038/73009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Critchley H. D., Corfield D. R., Chandler M. P., Mathias C. J., Dolan R. J. Cerebral correlates of autonomic cardiovascular arousal: a functional neuroimaging investigation in humans. J Physiol. 2000 Feb 15;523(Pt 1):259–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00259.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Critchley H. D., Mathias C. J., Dolan R. J. Neuroanatomical basis for first- and second-order representations of bodily states. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Feb;4(2):207–212. doi: 10.1038/84048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Csibra Gergely. Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):447–458. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Devinsky O., Morrell M. J., Vogt B. A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995 Feb;118(Pt 1):279–306. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.1.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Downar J., Crawley A. P., Mikulis D. J., Davis K. D. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):277–283. doi: 10.1038/72991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferstl Evelyn C., von Cramon D. Yves. What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: coherence or theory of mind? Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1599–1612. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fine C., Lumsden J., Blair R. J. Dissociation between 'theory of mind' and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain. 2001 Feb;124(Pt 2):287–298. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.2.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fink G. R., Markowitsch H. J., Reinkemeier M., Bruckbauer T., Kessler J., Heiss W. D. Cerebral representation of one's own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1;16(13):4275–4282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-13-04275.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fletcher P. C., Happé F., Frith U., Baker S. C., Dolan R. J., Frackowiak R. S., Frith C. D. Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of "theory of mind" in story comprehension. Cognition. 1995 Nov;57(2):109–128. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Frith C. D., Frith U. Interacting minds--a biological basis. Science. 1999 Nov 26;286(5445):1692–1695. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gallagher H. L., Happé F., Brunswick N., Fletcher P. C., Frith U., Frith C. D. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(1):11–21. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gallagher Helen L., Jack Anthony I., Roepstorff Andreas, Frith Christopher D. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):814–821. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Bíró S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition. 1995 Aug;56(2):165–193. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Goel V., Grafman J., Sadato N., Hallett M. Modeling other minds. Neuroreport. 1995 Sep 11;6(13):1741–1746. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199509000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Greene J. D., Sommerville R. B., Nystrom L. E., Darley J. M., Cohen J. D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105–2108. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., Blake R. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):711–720. doi: 10.1162/089892900562417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Grèzes J., Fonlupt P., Bertenthal B., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):775–785. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gusnard D. A., Akbudak E., Shulman G. L., Raichle M. E. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 20;98(7):4259–4264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071043098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Happé F. G. An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Apr;24(2):129–154. doi: 10.1007/BF02172093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Heyes C. M. Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Feb;21(1):101–148. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x98000703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoffman E. A., Haxby J. V. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):80–84. doi: 10.1038/71152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson Susan C. Detecting agents. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):549–559. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lane R. D., Fink G. R., Chau P. M., Dolan R. J. Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses. Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 22;8(18):3969–3972. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199712220-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lane R. D., Reiman E. M., Axelrod B., Yun L. S., Holmes A., Schwartz G. E. Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):525–535. doi: 10.1162/089892998562924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee A. C. H., Robbins T. W., Graham K. S., Owen A. M. "Pray or Prey?" dissociation of semantic memory retrieval from episodic memory processes using positron emission tomography and a novel homophone task. Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):724–735. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lempers J. D., Flavell E. R., Flavell J. H. The development in very young children of tacit knowledge concerning visual perception. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1977 Feb;95(1):3–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Leslie A. M. Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):211–238. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90029-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lillard A. Ethnopsychologies: cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychol Bull. 1998 Jan;123(1):3–32. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Maguire E. A., Frith C. D., Morris R. G. The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. Brain. 1999 Oct;122(Pt 10):1839–1850. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Maguire E. A., Mummery C. J., Büchel C. Patterns of hippocampal-cortical interaction dissociate temporal lobe memory subsystems. Hippocampus. 2000;10(4):475–482. doi: 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<475::AID-HIPO14>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maguire E. A., Mummery C. J. Differential modulation of a common memory retrieval network revealed by positron emission tomography. Hippocampus. 1999;9(1):54–61. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:1<54::AID-HIPO6>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Maguire E. A., Vargha-Khadem F., Mishkin M. The effects of bilateral hippocampal damage on fMRI regional activations and interactions during memory retrieval. Brain. 2001 Jun;124(Pt 6):1156–1170. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.6.1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Maratos E. J., Dolan R. J., Morris J. S., Henson R. N., Rugg M. D. Neural activity associated with episodic memory for emotional context. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(9):910–920. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Masangkay Z. S., McCluskey K. A., McIntyre C. W., Sims-Knight J., Vaughn B. E., Flavell J. H. The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. Child Dev. 1974 Jun;45(2):357–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. McGuire P. K., Paulesu E., Frackowiak R. S., Frith C. D. Brain activity during stimulus independent thought. Neuroreport. 1996 Sep 2;7(13):2095–2099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Morán M. A., Mufson E. J., Mesulam M. M. Neural inputs into the temporopolar cortex of the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1987 Feb 1;256(1):88–103. doi: 10.1002/cne.902560108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nakamura K., Kawashima R., Sato N., Nakamura A., Sugiura M., Kato T., Hatano K., Ito K., Fukuda H., Schormann T. Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing. A PET study. Brain. 2000 Sep;123(Pt 9):1903–1912. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nakamura K., Kawashima R., Sugiura M., Kato T., Nakamura A., Hatano K., Nagumo S., Kubota K., Fukuda H., Ito K. Neural substrates for recognition of familiar voices: a PET study. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(10):1047–1054. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nimchinsky E. A., Gilissen E., Allman J. M., Perl D. P., Erwin J. M., Hof P. R. A neuronal morphologic type unique to humans and great apes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5268–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Noppeney U., Price C. J. A PET study of stimulus- and task-induced semantic processing. Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):927–935. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Noppeney U., Price C. J. Retrieval of visual, auditory, and abstract semantics. Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):917–926. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Petit L., Courtney S. M., Ungerleider L. G., Haxby J. V. Sustained activity in the medial wall during working memory delays. J Neurosci. 1998 Nov 15;18(22):9429–9437. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-22-09429.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Petrovic Predrag, Ingvar Martin. Imaging cognitive modulation of pain processing. Pain. 2002 Jan;95(1-2):1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00467-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Phan K. Luan, Wager Tor, Taylor Stephan F., Liberzon Israel. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):331–348. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Phillips Ann T., Wellman Henry M., Spelke Elizabeth S. Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition. 2002 Aug;85(1):53–78. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Picard N., Strick P. L. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex. 1996 May-Jun;6(3):342–353. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.3.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Povinelli D. J., Preuss T. M. Theory of mind: evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends Neurosci. 1995 Sep;18(9):418–424. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93939-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Povinelli D. J., deBlois S. Young children's (Homo sapiens) understanding of knowledge formation in themselves and others. J Comp Psychol. 1992 Sep;106(3):228–238. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.3.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Puce A., Allison T., Bentin S., Gore J. C., McCarthy G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J Neurosci. 1998 Mar 15;18(6):2188–2199. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02188.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Puce Aina, Perrett David. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):435–445. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rainville P., Hofbauer R. K., Paus T., Duncan G. H., Bushnell M. C., Price D. D. Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Jan;11(1):110–125. doi: 10.1162/089892999563175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Repacholi B. M. Infants' use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person's emotional expression. Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):1017–1025. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rizzolatti Giacomo, Fogassi Leonardo, Gallese Vittorio. Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):149–154. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rowe A. D., Bullock P. R., Polkey C. E., Morris R. G. "Theory of mind" impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain. 2001 Mar;124(Pt 3):600–616. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.3.600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ruffman T., Perner J., Naito M., Parkin L., Clements W. A. Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Dev Psychol. 1998 Jan;34(1):161–174. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schultz Robert T., Grelotti David J., Klin Ami, Kleinman Jamie, Van der Gaag Christiaan, Marois René, Skudlarski Pawel. The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: implications for the pathobiology of autism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 28;358(1430):415–427. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shatz M., Wellman H. M., Silber S. The acquisition of mental verbs: a systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition. 1983 Nov;14(3):301–321. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Vandenberghe R., Nobre A. C., Price C. J. The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):550–560. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Vandenberghe R., Price C., Wise R., Josephs O., Frackowiak R. S. Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature. 1996 Sep 19;383(6597):254–256. doi: 10.1038/383254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Varley R., Siegal M., Want S. C. Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase. 2001;7(6):489–493. doi: 10.1093/neucas/7.6.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Vogeley K., Bussfeld P., Newen A., Herrmann S., Happé F., Falkai P., Maier W., Shah N. J., Fink G. R., Zilles K. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 1):170–181. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wellman H. M., Estes D. Early understanding of mental entities: a reexamination of childhood realism. Child Dev. 1986 Aug;57(4):910–923. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wellman H. M., Phillips A. T., Rodriguez T. Young children's understanding of perception, desire, and emotion. Child Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):895–912. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wicker B., Michel F., Henaff M. A., Decety J. Brain regions involved in the perception of gaze: a PET study. Neuroimage. 1998 Aug;8(2):221–227. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wimmer H., Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition. 1983 Jan;13(1):103–128. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Woodward A. L. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition. 1998 Nov;69(1):1–34. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zeki S., Watson J. D., Lueck C. J., Friston K. J., Kennard C., Frackowiak R. S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1991 Mar;11(3):641–649. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00641.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zysset Stefan, Huber Oswald, Ferstl Evelyn, von Cramon D. Yves. The anterior frontomedian cortex and evaluative judgment: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):983–991. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES