Abstract
The effects of herbicide management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) beet, maize and spring oilseed rape on the abundance and diversity of soil-surface-active invertebrates were assessed. Most effects did not differ between years, environmental zones or initial seedbanks or between sugar and fodder beet. This suggests that the results may be treated as generally applicable to agricultural situations throughout the UK for these crops. The direction of the effects was evenly balanced between increases and decreases in counts in the GMHT compared with the conventional treatment. Most effects involving a greater capture in the GMHT treatments occurred in maize, whereas most effects involving a smaller capture were in beet and spring oilseed rape. Differences between GMHT and conventional crop herbicide management had a significant effect on the capture of most surface-active invertebrate species and higher taxa tested in at least one crop, and these differences reflected the phenology and ecology of the invertebrates. Counts of carabids that feed on weed seeds were smaller in GMHT beet and spring oilseed rape but larger in GMHT maize. In contrast, collembolan detritivore counts were significantly larger under GMHT crop management.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (290.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berger W. H., Parker F. L. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science. 1970 Jun 12;168(3937):1345–1347. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3937.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champion G. T., May M. J., Bennett S., Brooks D. R., Clark S. J., Daniels R. E., Firbank L. G., Haughton A. J., Hawes C., Heard M. S. Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1801–1818. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dewar Alan M., May Mike J., Woiwod Ian P., Haylock Lisa A., Champion Gillian T., Garner Beulah H., Sands Richard J. N., Qi Aiming, Pidgeon John D. A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 22;270(1513):335–340. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firbank L. G., Barr C. J., Bunce R. G. H., Furse M. T., Haines-Young R., Hornung M., Howard D. C., Sheail J., Sier A., Smart S. M. Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. J Environ Manage. 2003 Mar;67(3):207–218. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00174-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firbank L. G., Forcella F. Agriculture. Genetically modified crops and farmland biodiversity. Science. 2000 Sep 1;289(5484):1481–1482. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawes C., Haughton A. J., Osborne J. L., Roy D. B., Clark S. J., Perry J. N., Rothery P., Bohan D. A., Brooks D. R., Champion G. T. Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1899–1913. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry J. N. Multiple-comparison procedures: a dissenting view. J Econ Entomol. 1986 Oct;79(5):1149–1155. doi: 10.1093/jee/79.5.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Squire G. R., Brooks D. R., Bohan D. A., Champion G. T., Daniels R. E., Haughton A. J., Hawes C., Heard M. S., Hill M. O., May M. J. On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1779–1799. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]