Abstract
The Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops (GMHT) were conducted in the UK from 2000 to 2002 on beet (sugar and fodder), spring oilseed rape and forage maize. The management of the crops studied is described and compared with current conventional commercial practice. The distribution of field sites adequately represented the areas currently growing these crops, and the sample contained sites operated at a range of management intensities, including low intensity. Herbicide inputs were audited, and the active ingredients used and the rates and the timings of applications compared well with current practice for both GMHT and conventional crops. Inputs on sugar beet were lower than, and inputs on spring oilseed rape and forage maize were consistent with, national averages. Regression analysis of herbicide-application strategies and weed emergence showed that inputs applied by farmers increased with weed densities in beet and forage maize. GMHT crops generally received only one herbicide active ingredient per crop, later and fewer herbicide sprays and less active ingredient (for beet and maize) than the conventional treatments. The audit of inputs found no evidence of bias.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (442.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dewar Alan M., May Mike J., Woiwod Ian P., Haylock Lisa A., Champion Gillian T., Garner Beulah H., Sands Richard J. N., Qi Aiming, Pidgeon John D. A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 22;270(1513):335–340. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firbank L. G. The Farm Scale Evaluations of spring-sown genetically modified crops. Introduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1777–1778. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawes C., Haughton A. J., Osborne J. L., Roy D. B., Clark S. J., Perry J. N., Rothery P., Bohan D. A., Brooks D. R., Champion G. T. Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1899–1913. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy D. B., Bohan D. A., Haughton A. J., Hill M. O., Osborne J. L., Clark S. J., Perry J. N., Rothery P., Scott R. J., Brooks D. R. Invertebrates and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1879–1898. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Squire G. R., Brooks D. R., Bohan D. A., Champion G. T., Daniels R. E., Haughton A. J., Hawes C., Heard M. S., Hill M. O., May M. J. On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1779–1799. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watkinson A. R., Freckleton R. P., Robinson R. A., Sutherland W. J. Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science. 2000 Sep 1;289(5484):1554–1557. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.