Abstract
We compared the seedbanks, seed rains, plant densities and biomasses of weeds under two contrasting systems of management in beet, maize and spring oilseed rape. Weed seedbank and plant density were measured at the same locations in two subsequent seasons. About 60 fields were sown with each crop. Each field was split, one half being sown with a conventional variety managed according to the farmer's normal practice, the other half being sown with a genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) variety, with weeds controlled by a broad-spectrum herbicide. In beet and rape, plant densities shortly after sowing were higher in the GMHT treatment. Following weed control in conventional beet, plant densities were approximately one-fifth of those in GMHT beet. In both beet and rape, this effect was reversed after the first application of broad-spectrum herbicide, so that late-season plant densities were lower in the GMHT treatments. Biomass and seed rain in GMHT crops were between one-third and one-sixth of those in conventional treatments. The effects of differing weed-seed returns in these two crops persisted in the seedbank: densities following the GMHT treatment were about 20% lower than those following the conventional treatment. The effect of growing maize was quite different. Weed density was higher throughout the season in the GMHT treatment. Late-season biomass was 82% higher and seed rain was 87% higher than in the conventional treatment. The difference was not subsequently detectable in the seedbank because the total seed return was low after both treatments. In all three crops, weed diversity was little affected by the treatment, except for transient effects immediately following herbicide application.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (261.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berger W. H., Parker F. L. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science. 1970 Jun 12;168(3937):1345–1347. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3937.1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckelew L. D., Pedigo L. P., Mero H. M., Owen M. D., Tylka G. L. Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybeans. J Econ Entomol. 2000 Oct;93(5):1437–1443. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.5.1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champion G. T., May M. J., Bennett S., Brooks D. R., Clark S. J., Daniels R. E., Firbank L. G., Haughton A. J., Hawes C., Heard M. S. Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1801–1818. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dewar Alan M., May Mike J., Woiwod Ian P., Haylock Lisa A., Champion Gillian T., Garner Beulah H., Sands Richard J. N., Qi Aiming, Pidgeon John D. A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 22;270(1513):335–340. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hails RS. Genetically modified plants - the debate continues. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):14–18. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01751-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawes C., Haughton A. J., Osborne J. L., Roy D. B., Clark S. J., Perry J. N., Rothery P., Bohan D. A., Brooks D. R., Champion G. T. Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 29;358(1439):1899–1913. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watkinson A. R., Freckleton R. P., Robinson R. A., Sutherland W. J. Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Science. 2000 Sep 1;289(5484):1554–1557. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]