Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jan 29;359(1441):79–86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1367

Repairing a double-strand chromosome break by homologous recombination: revisiting Robin Holliday's model.

James E Haber 1, Gregorz Ira 1, Anna Malkova 1, Neal Sugawara 1
PMCID: PMC1693306  PMID: 15065659

Abstract

Since the pioneering model for homologous recombination proposed by Robin Holliday in 1964, there has been great progress in understanding how recombination occurs at a molecular level. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, one can follow recombination by physically monitoring DNA after the synchronous induction of a double-strand break (DSB) in both wild-type and mutant cells. A particularly well-studied system has been the switching of yeast mating-type (MAT) genes, where a DSB can be induced synchronously by expression of the site-specific HO endonuclease. Similar studies can be performed in meiotic cells, where DSBs are created by the Spo11 nuclease. There appear to be at least two competing mechanisms of homologous recombination: a synthesis-dependent strand annealing pathway leading to noncrossovers and a two-end strand invasion mechanism leading to formation and resolution of Holliday junctions (HJs), leading to crossovers. The establishment of a modified replication fork during DSB repair links gene conversion to another important repair process, break-induced replication. Despite recent revelations, almost 40 years after Holliday's model was published, the essential ideas he proposed of strand invasion and heteroduplex DNA formation, the formation and resolution of HJs, and mismatch repair, remain the basis of our thinking.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (465.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allers T., Lichten M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell. 2001 Jul 13;106(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00416-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allers T., Lichten M. Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA. Mol Cell. 2001 Jul;8(1):225–231. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00280-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belmaaza A., Chartrand P. One-sided invasion events in homologous recombination at double-strand breaks. Mutat Res. 1994 May;314(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(94)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergerat A., de Massy B., Gadelle D., Varoutas P. C., Nicolas A., Forterre P. An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):414–417. doi: 10.1038/386414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosco G., Haber J. E. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1037–1047. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Connolly B., White C. I., Haber J. E. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2342–2349. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson D. O., Holloman W. K. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5419–5424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J. E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1292–1303. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbertson L. A., Stahl F. W. A test of the double-strand break repair model for meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):27–41. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gloor G. B., Nassif N. A., Johnson-Schlitz D. M., Preston C. R., Engels W. R. Targeted gene replacement in Drosophila via P element-induced gap repair. Science. 1991 Sep 6;253(5024):1110–1117. doi: 10.1126/science.1653452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haber J. E. DNA recombination: the replication connection. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999 Jul;24(7):271–275. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01413-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haber J. E., Ray B. L., Kolb J. M., White C. I. Rapid kinetics of mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA that is formed during recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3363–3367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henson Jeremy D., Neumann Axel A., Yeager Thomas R., Reddel Roger R. Alternative lengthening of telomeres in mammalian cells. Oncogene. 2002 Jan 21;21(4):598–610. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes A. M., Haber J. E. Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases. Cell. 1999 Feb 5;96(3):415–424. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80554-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ira Grzegorz, Haber James E. Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Sep;22(18):6384–6392. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6384-6392.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jensen R. E., Herskowitz I. Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:97–104. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keeney S., Giroux C. N., Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):375–384. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kogoma T. Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Jun;61(2):212–238. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.212-238.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kraus E., Leung W. Y., Haber J. E. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(15):8255–8262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151008198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuzminov A., Stahl F. W. Double-strand end repair via the RecBC pathway in Escherichia coli primes DNA replication. Genes Dev. 1999 Feb 1;13(3):345–356. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.3.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Labib K., Tercero J. A., Diffley J. F. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science. 2000 Jun 2;288(5471):1643–1647. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Le S., Moore J. K., Haber J. E., Greider C. W. RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):143–152. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lundblad V., Blackburn E. H. An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues est1- senescence. Cell. 1993 Apr 23;73(2):347–360. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90234-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Malkova A., Ivanov E. L., Haber J. E. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7131–7136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McGill C., Shafer B., Strathern J. Coconversion of flanking sequences with homothallic switching. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):459–467. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90921-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Michel B. Replication fork arrest and DNA recombination. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Apr;25(4):173–178. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01560-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morrow D. M., Connelly C., Hieter P. "Break copy" duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):371–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Motamedi M. R., Szigety S. K., Rosenberg S. M. Double-strand-break repair recombination in Escherichia coli: physical evidence for a DNA replication mechanism in vivo. Genes Dev. 1999 Nov 1;13(21):2889–2903. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.21.2889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nasmyth K. A. Molecular genetics of yeast mating type. Annu Rev Genet. 1982;16:439–500. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.16.120182.002255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Yeast recombination: the association between double-strand gap repair and crossing-over. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4417–4421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Porter S. E., White M. A., Petes T. D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):5–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pâques F., Haber J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Jun;63(2):349–404. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rothstein R., Michel B., Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 2000 Jan 1;14(1):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwacha A., Kleckner N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell. 1995 Dec 1;83(5):783–791. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Signon L., Malkova A., Naylor M. L., Klein H., Haber J. E. Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar;21(6):2048–2056. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.6.2048-2056.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Strathern J. N., Klar A. J., Hicks J. B., Abraham J. A., Ivy J. M., Nasmyth K. A., McGill C. Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):183–192. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Teng S. C., Chang J., McCowan B., Zakian V. A. Telomerase-independent lengthening of yeast telomeres occurs by an abrupt Rad50p-dependent, Rif-inhibited recombinational process. Mol Cell. 2000 Oct;6(4):947–952. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00094-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Umezu K., Sugawara N., Chen C., Haber J. E., Kolodner R. D. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):989–1005. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.3.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. White C. I., Haber J. E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Mar;9(3):663–673. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. White J. H., Lusnak K., Fogel S. Mismatch-specific post-meiotic segregation frequency in yeast suggests a heteroduplex recombination intermediate. Nature. 1985 May 23;315(6017):350–352. doi: 10.1038/315350a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Williamson M. S., Game J. C., Fogel S. Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. Genetics. 1985 Aug;110(4):609–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.4.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES