Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):711–719. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1454

The role of taxonomy in species conservation.

Georgina M Mace 1
PMCID: PMC1693347  PMID: 15253356

Abstract

Taxonomy and species conservation are often assumed to be completely interdependent activities. However, a shortage of taxonomic information and skills, and confusion over where the limits to 'species' should be set, both cause problems for conservationists. There is no simple solution because species lists used for conservation planning (e.g. threatened species, species richness estimates, species covered by legislation) are often also used to determine which units should be the focus of conservation actions; this despite the fact that the two processes have such different goals and information needs. Species conservation needs two kinds of taxonomic solution: (i) a set of practical rules to standardize the species units included on lists; and (ii) an approach to the units chosen for conservation recovery planning which recognizes the dynamic nature of natural systems and the differences from the units in listing processes that result. These solutions are well within our grasp but require a new kind of collaboration among conservation biologists, taxonomists and legislators, as well as an increased resource of taxonomists with relevant and high-quality skills.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agapow Paul-Michael, Bininda-Emonds Olaf R., Crandall Keith A., Gittleman John L., Mace Georgina M., Marshall Jonathon C., Purvis Andy. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q Rev Biol. 2004 Jun;79(2):161–179. doi: 10.1086/383542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds OR, Mace GM, Wayne RK. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):290–295. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dayton Paul K. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation: (an American Society of Naturalists symposium paper). Am Nat. 2003 Jun 27;162(1):1–13. doi: 10.1086/376572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desmet P. G., Cowling R. M., Ellis A. G., Pressey R. L. Integrating biosystematic data into conservation planning: perspectives from southern Africa's Succulent Karoo. Syst Biol. 2002 Apr;51(2):317–330. doi: 10.1080/10635150252899798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eggert Lori S., Rasner Caylor A., Woodruff David S. The evolution and phylogeography of the African elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 7;269(1504):1993–2006. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser D. J., Bernatchez L. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol. 2001 Dec;10(12):2741–2752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hey J. The mind of the species problem. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):326–329. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02145-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hopkins John. Molecular immunology--gene regulation and signal transduction. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002 Sep 10;87(3-4):245–249. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(02)00090-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houlahan J. E., Findlay C. S., Schmidt B. R., Meyer A. H., Kuzmin S. L. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature. 2000 Apr 13;404(6779):752–755. doi: 10.1038/35008052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackson J. B., Kirby M. X., Berger W. H., Bjorndal K. A., Botsford L. W., Bourque B. J., Bradbury R. H., Cooke R., Erlandson J., Estes J. A. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):629–637. doi: 10.1126/science.1059199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kremen C., Niles J. O., Dalton M. G., Daily G. C., Ehrlich P. R., Fay J. P., Grewal D., Guillery R. P. Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1828–1832. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lughadha Eimear Nic. Towards a working list of all known plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):681–687. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mace Georgina M., Gittleman John L., Purvis Andy. Preserving the tree of life. Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1707–1709. doi: 10.1126/science.1085510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margules C. R., Pressey R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):243–253. doi: 10.1038/35012251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moritz Craig. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol. 2002 Apr;51(2):238–254. doi: 10.1080/10635150252899752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers N., Mittermeier R. A., Mittermeier C. G., da Fonseca G. A., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pauly D, Christensen V, V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F., Jr Fishing down marine food webs . Science. 1998 Feb 6;279(5352):860–863. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5352.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roca A. L., Georgiadis N., Pecon-Slattery J., O'Brien S. J. Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science. 2001 Aug 24;293(5534):1473–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1059936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Samper Cristián. Taxonomy and environmental policy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):721–728. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor Andrea B., Groves Colin P. Patterns of mandibular variation in Pan and Gorilla and implications for African ape taxonomy. J Hum Evol. 2003 May;44(5):529–561. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2484(03)00027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tear T. H., Scott J. M., Hayward P. H., Griffith B. Status and prospects for success of the endangered species act: a look at recovery plans. Science. 1993 Nov 12;262(5136):976–977. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5136.976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wheeler Quentin D. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):571–583. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES