Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):639–653. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1453

Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal.

Peter L Forey 1, Richard A Fortey 1, Paul Kenrick 1, Andrew B Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1693348  PMID: 15253350

Abstract

Many compendia at the species, genus and family levels document the fossil record, but these are not standardized, nor usually critical in content, and few are available on the World Wide Web. The sampling of the available record is good for organisms with fossilizable parts, but preservational constraints on the entire morphology, life history and geographical distribution lead to difficulties in recognizing and naming species. We recommend abandoning some of the palaeontological species concepts such as chronospecies and stratospecies, and we advocate species recognition based on unique combinations of characters. The compilation of species lists is extremely time consuming, and given the inherent problems we suggest that compilation of generic lists is a more achievable goal because genera are recognized by definitive morphological characters. In calculating taxon duration, care must be taken to distinguish between mono-, para- and polyphyletic groups, the first being the only reliable unit for use in calculating diversity curves. We support the inclusion of fossils into classifications based on Recent organisms, but we recognize some of the problems this may pose for standard Linnaean classifications. Web-based taxonomy is the way forward, having the advantages of speed and currency of information dissemination, universal access with links to primary literature and increasingly sophisticated imagery. These advantages over conventional outlets will only be realized with careful Web design and a commitment to maintenance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (424.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alroy J., Marshall C. R., Bambach R. K., Bezusko K., Foote M., Fursich F. T., Hansen T. A., Holland S. M., Ivany L. C., Jablonski D. Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 15;98(11):6261–6266. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111144698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton M. J. Diversification and extinction in the history of life. Science. 1995 Apr 7;268(5207):52–58. doi: 10.1126/science.7701342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benton M. J. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Nov;75(4):633–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2000.tb00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant Harold N., Cantino Philip D. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):39–55. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cantino P. D., Bryant H. N., de Queiroz K., Donoghue M. J., Eriksson T., Hillis D. M., Lee M. S. Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Syst Biol. 1999 Dec;48(4):790–807. doi: 10.1080/106351599260012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finlay Bland J. Protist taxonomy: an ecological perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):599–610. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foote M., Raup D. M. Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. Paleobiology. 1996 Spring;22(2):121–140. doi: 10.1017/s0094837300016134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foote M., Sepkoski J. J., Jr Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record. Nature. 1999 Apr 1;398(6726):415–417. doi: 10.1038/18872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Raup D. M. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology. 1991;17(1):37–48. doi: 10.1017/s0094837300010332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raup D. M., Sepkoski J. J., Jr, Stigler S. M. Mass extinctions in the fossil record. Science. 1983 Mar 11;219(4589):1240–1241. doi: 10.1126/science.219.4589.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scoble Malcolm J. Unitary or unified taxonomy? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):699–710. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sepkoski J. J., Jr A compendium of fossil marine animal families, 2nd edition. Contrib Biol Geol. 1992 Mar 1;83:1–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sepkoski J. J., Jr Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology. 1993 Winter;19(1):43–51. doi: 10.1017/s0094837300012306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sutton M. D., Briggs D. E., Siveter D. J., Siveter D. J. An exceptionally preserved vermiform mollusc from the Silurian of England. Nature. 2001 Mar 22;410(6827):461–463. doi: 10.1038/35068549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES