Abstract
Nomenclature, far from being a dry dusty subject, is today more relevant than ever before. Researchers into genomics are discovering again the need for systems of nomenclature-names are what we use to communicate about organisms, and by extension the rest of their biology. Here, we briefly outline the history of the published international codes of nomenclature, tracing them from the time of Linnaeus in the eighteenth century to the present day. We then outline some of what we feel are the major challenges that face the codes in the twenty-first century; focusing primarily on publication, priority, typification and the role of science in the naming of organisms. We conclude that the codes are essential for taxonomists in the pursuance of their science, and that the democratic nature of decision-making in the regulation of the rules of nomenclature, though sometimes perceived as a potential weakness, is in fact one of its great strengths.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cavalier-Smith T. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Mar;52(Pt 2):297–354. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-2-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corliss J. O. Should there be a separate code of nomenclature for the protists? Biosystems. 1992;28(1-3):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(92)90003-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forey Peter L., Fortey Richard A., Kenrick Paul, Smith Andrew B. Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):639–653. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godfray H. C. J., Knapp S. Introduction. Taxonomy for the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):559–569. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godfray H. Charles J. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):17–19. doi: 10.1038/417017a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lughadha Eimear Nic. Towards a working list of all known plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):681–687. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oren Aharon. Prokaryote diversity and taxonomy: current status and future challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):623–638. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson H. Biology's name game. Nature. 2001 Jun 7;411(6838):631–632. doi: 10.1038/35079694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoble Malcolm J. Unitary or unified taxonomy? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):699–710. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tindall B. J. Misunderstanding the Bacteriological Code. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999 Jul;49(Pt 3):1313–1316. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-3-1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Regenmortel M. H. Virus species, a much overlooked but essential concept in virus classification. Intervirology. 1990;31(5):241–254. doi: 10.1159/000150159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wain Hester M., Lush Michael, Ducluzeau Fabrice, Povey Sue. Genew: the human gene nomenclature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):169–171. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White J., Wain H., Bruford E., Povey S. Promoting a standard nomenclature for genes and proteins. Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):347–347. doi: 10.1038/46405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]