Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jul 29;359(1447):1133–1136. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1486

Informed consent and public health.

Onora O'Neill 1
PMCID: PMC1693386  PMID: 15306401

Abstract

During the past 25 years, medical ethics has concentrated largely on clinical medicine and the treatment of individual patients. This focus permits a view of medical provision as a (quasi-) consumer good, whose distribution can be or should be contingent on individual choice. The approach cannot be extended to public health provision. Public health provision, including measures for limiting the spread of infectious diseases, is a public good and can be provided for some only if provided for many. The provision or non-provision of public goods cannot be contingent on individual informed consent, so must be in some respects compulsory. An adequate ethics of public health needs to set aside debates about informed consent and to consider the permissible limits of just compulsion for various types of public good. It will therefore gain more from engaging with work in political philosophy than with individualistic work in ethics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (62.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gamblin S. J., Haire L. F., Russell R. J., Stevens D. J., Xiao B., Ha Y., Vasisht N., Steinhauer D. A., Daniels R. S., Elliot A. The structure and receptor binding properties of the 1918 influenza hemagglutinin. Science. 2004 Feb 5;303(5665):1838–1842. doi: 10.1126/science.1093155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES