Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Nov 29;359(1451):1685–1695. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1542

Law and the sources of morality.

Robert A Hinde 1
PMCID: PMC1693449  PMID: 15590610

Abstract

This paper argues that morality is a product of basic human psychological characteristics shaped over prehistorical and historical time by diachronic dialectical transactions between what individuals do and what they are supposed to do in the culture in which they live. Some principles are pancultural: individuals are motivated to look after their own interests, to be cooperative and kind to other group members and to look after their children. The moral precepts of every society are based on these principles, but may differ according to the vicissitudes that the society has experienced. Thus the basic principles can be seen as absolute; the precepts based on them may be specific to particular societies. Moral precepts, and the laws derived from them, are mostly such as to maintain the cohesion of the society, but some have been formulated to further the interests of those in power. The evidence suggests that laws have been developed, by common consent or by rulers, from generally accepted moral intuitions. In general, legal systems have been formulated to deal with the more extreme infringements of moral codes. Morality prescribes how people should behave; the law is concerned with how they should not. New laws, if not imposed by force, must generally be in tune with public conceptions of morality.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevc I, I, Silverman I., I Early separation and sibling incest. A test of the revised Westermarck theory. Evol Hum Behav. 2000 May 1;21(3):151–161. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(99)00041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grant J. C., Bittles A. H. The comparative role of consanguinity in infant and childhood mortality in Pakistan. Ann Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;61(Pt 2):143–149. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.1997.6120143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hawkes K., O'Connell J. F., Blurton Jones N. G. Hadza meat sharing. Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Mar;22(2):113–142. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00066-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. deVries M. W. Temperament and infant mortality among the Masai of East Africa. Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;141(10):1189–1194. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.10.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES