Abstract
This paper discusses several issues at the intersection of law and brain science. It focuses principally on ways in which an improved understanding of how evolutionary processes affect brain function and human behaviour may improve law's ability to regulate behaviour. It explores sample uses of such 'evolutionary analysis in law' and also raises questions about how that analysis might be improved in the future. Among the discussed uses are: (i) clarifying cost-benefit analyses; (ii) providing theoretical foundation and potential predictive power; (iii) assessing comparative effectiveness of legal strategies; and (iv) revealing deep patterns in legal architecture. Throughout, the paper emphasizes the extent to which effective law requires: (i) building effective behavioural models; (ii) integrating life-science perspectives with social-science perspectives; (iii) considering the effects of brain biology on behaviours that law seeks to regulate; and (iv) examining the effects of evolutionary processes on brain design.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Faigman David L. Science and the law. Is science different for lawyers? Science. 2002 Jul 19;297(5580):339–340. doi: 10.1126/science.1072515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MAYR E. Cause and effect in biology. Science. 1961 Nov 10;134(3489):1501–1506. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3489.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rilling James, Gutman David, Zeh Thorsten, Pagnoni Giuseppe, Berns Gregory, Kilts Clinton. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron. 2002 Jul 18;35(2):395–405. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00755-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wehner R. Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Jul 23;189(8):579–588. doi: 10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]