Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1992 May;82(5):680–684. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.5.680

The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988.

E R Declercq 1
PMCID: PMC1694140  PMID: 1566946

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The use of midwives is a natural solution to the problem of improving access to skilled perinatal services while lowering costs. The number of midwife-attended births has grown from 0.9% of all births in 1975 to 3.4% of all births in 1988. The purpose of the study was to determine how mothers served by midwives and the settings in which they are served have changed in that period. METHODS. The analysis is based on birth certificate data from 1975 to 1988 from the Natality, Marriage and Divorce Statistics Branch of the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control. RESULTS. Almost all of the growth (93.2%) in midwife-attended births from 1975 to 1988 was in hospitals; 87.3% of all births attended by midwives occurred in hospitals. Pronounced differences exist between mothers served by midwives in and outside of hospitals, and there are strong regional patterns in midwife attendance at birth. CONCLUSIONS. Given the positive outcomes associated with midwifery practice, further research into the content of midwifery care is recommended.

Full text

PDF
680

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Butter I. H., Kay B. J. State laws and the practice of lay midwifery. Am J Public Health. 1988 Sep;78(9):1161–1169. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Declercq E. R. Out-of-hospital births, U.S., 1978: birth weight and Apgar scores as measures of outcome. Public Health Rep. 1984 Jan-Feb;99(1):63–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lehrman E. J., Paine L. L. Trends in nurse-midwifery. Results of the 1988 ACNM Division of Research Mini-Survey. J Nurse Midwifery. 1990 Jul-Aug;35(4):192–203. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(90)90111-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Levit K. R., Freeland M. S., Waldo D. R. National health care spending trends: 1988. Health Aff (Millwood) 1990 Summer;9(2):171–184. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mullinax K. Supplemental report on nurse-midwifery legislation. J Nurse Midwifery. 1987 May-Jun;32(3):156–180. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(87)90083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nesbitt T. S., Connell F. A., Hart L. G., Rosenblatt R. A. Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):814–818. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rooks J. P., Weatherby N. L., Ernst E. K., Stapleton S., Rosen D., Rosenfield A. Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study. N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 28;321(26):1804–1811. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912283212606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosenblatt R. A. The perinatal paradox: doing more and accomplishing less. Health Aff (Millwood) 1989 Fall;8(3):158–168. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.8.3.158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wagner M. G. Infant mortality in Europe: implications for the United States. Statement to the National Commission to Prevent Infant Mortality. J Public Health Policy. 1988 Winter;9(4):473–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES