Abstract
BACKGROUND. The measurement of physical disability as an indication of the impact of disease is commonly seen in research. However, these measures often do not clearly differentiate between functional limitations and daily performance of an activity. METHODS. We measured the differences between self-reported disability and observed functional limitations in six activities of daily living tasks among community-dwelling elders. The value of functional limitations vs disability measures in determining risk factors for disablement was ascertained. RESULTS. Systematic differences were found among the 1453 participants. At least 89% of the time when a difference was identified, the subjects ranked disability greater than the functional limitations observed. For those who were cognitively impaired, discrepancies occurred up to 11% of the time. In determining risk factors for disablement, we found that neurological impairments were associated with both functional limitations and disability, while sociocultural factors were associated with disability only. CONCLUSIONS. Our findings suggest that physical functional limitations and disability in the elderly are two distinct concepts and that the measure of choice should be determined by research objectives and the type of population being studied.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guralnik J. M., Branch L. G., Cummings S. R., Curb J. D. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol. 1989 Sep;44(5):M141–M146. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.5.m141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jette A. M., Branch L. G. The Framingham Disability Study: II. Physical disability among the aging. Am J Public Health. 1981 Nov;71(11):1211–1216. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.11.1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz S., Downs T. D., Cash H. R., Grotz R. C. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20–30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minaker K. L., Rowe J. Health and disease among the oldest old: a clinical perspective. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1985 Spring;63(2):324–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick D. L., Darby S. C., Green S., Horton G., Locker D., Wiggins R. D. Screening for disability in the inner city. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Mar;35(1):65–70. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiener J. M., Hanley R. J., Clark R., Van Nostrand J. F. Measuring the activities of daily living: comparisons across national surveys. J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):S229–S237. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.6.s229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]