Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1992 Dec;82(12):1626–1630. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.12.1626

HMO vs fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction.

D M Carlisle 1, A L Siu 1, E B Keeler 1, E A McGlynn 1, K L Kahn 1, L V Rubenstein 1, R H Brook 1
PMCID: PMC1694547  PMID: 1456337

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) continue to grow in number and in their enrollment of Medicare recipients. They are also increasingly viewed as organizational structures that might contribute to control of health care costs. Yet little is known about the quality of care that elderly HMO enrollees receive. METHODS. We compared patients from three HMOs to a fee-for-service (FFS) sample that was national in scope. Sickness at admission, the quality of process of care, and mortality were assessed for patients aged 65 years and older who had been hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS. After adjustment for sickness at admission, there were no significant mortality differences between the HMO and FFS groups at either 30 (23.2% vs 23.5%) or 180 days (34.4% vs 34.5%) after admission. Compliance with process criteria was higher for the HMO group as a whole (P < .05). The HMOs had greater compliance with three of five scales measuring different aspects of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that older patients from our participating HMOs who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction received hospital care that was generally better in terms of process than that received by patients in a national FFS sample.

Full text

PDF
1626

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cunningham F. C., Williamson J. W. How does the quality of health care in HMOs compare to that in other settings? An analytic literature review: 1958 to 1979. Group Health J. 1980 Winter;1(1):4–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Draper D., Kahn K. L., Reinisch E. J., Sherwood M. J., Carney M. F., Kosecoff J., Keeler E. B., Rogers W. H., Savitt H., Allen H. Studying the effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care. Design, sampling, and fieldwork. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1956–1961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellwood P. M. Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jun 9;318(23):1549–1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198806093182327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kahn K. L., Rogers W. H., Rubenstein L. V., Sherwood M. J., Reinisch E. J., Keeler E. B., Draper D., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1969–1973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kahn K. L., Rubenstein L. V., Draper D., Kosecoff J., Rogers W. H., Keeler E. B., Brook R. H. The effects of the DRG-based prospective payment system on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients. An introduction to the series. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1953–1955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keeler E. B., Kahn K. L., Draper D., Sherwood M. J., Rubenstein L. V., Reinisch E. J., Kosecoff J., Brook R. H. Changes in sickness at admission following the introduction of the prospective payment system. JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1962–1968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Killip T., 3rd, Kimball J. T. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967 Oct;20(4):457–464. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knaus W. A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818–829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laffel G., Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA. 1989 Nov 24;262(20):2869–2873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langwell K. M., Hadley J. P. Evaluation of the Medicare competition demonstrations. Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Winter;11(2):65–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Manning W. G., Leibowitz A., Goldberg G. A., Rogers W. H., Newhouse J. P. A controlled trial of the effect of a prepaid group practice on use of services. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 7;310(23):1505–1510. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198406073102305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Norris R. M., Brandt P. W., Caughey D. E., Lee A. J., Scott P. J. A new coronary prognostic index. Lancet. 1969 Feb 8;1(7589):274–278. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shapiro S., Williams J. J., Yerby A. S., Densen P. M., Rosner H. Patterns of medical use by the indigent aged under two systems of medical care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967 May;57(5):784–790. doi: 10.2105/ajph.57.5.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES