Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1993 Jul;83(7):1011–1015. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.7.1011

Reporting efficiency during a measles outbreak in New York City, 1991.

S F Davis 1, P M Strebel 1, W L Atkinson 1, L E Markowitz 1, R W Sutter 1, K S Scanlon 1, S Friedman 1, S C Hadler 1
PMCID: PMC1694768  PMID: 8328595

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. During an epidemic of measles among preschool children in New York City, an investigation was conducted in 12 city hospitals to estimate reporting efficiency of measles to the New York City Department of Health. METHODS. Measles cases were identified by review of hospital emergency room and infection control logs and health department surveillance records. The Chandra Sekar Deming method was used (1) to estimate the total number of measles cases in persons less than 19 years old who presented to the 12 hospitals from January through March 1991 and (2) to estimate reporting efficiency. Information on mechanisms for reporting measles cases was collected from hospital infection control coordinators. RESULTS. The Chandra Sekar Deming method estimated that 1487 persons with measles presented to the 12 hospitals during the study period. The overall reporting efficiency was 45% (range = 19% to 83%). All 12 hospitals had passive surveillance for measles; 2 also had an active component. These 2 hospitals had the first and third highest measles reporting efficiencies. CONCLUSIONS. The reporting efficiency of measles cases by New York City hospitals to the health department was low, indicating that the magnitude of the outbreak was substantially greater than suggested by the number of reported cases.

Full text

PDF
1011

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkinson W. L., Orenstein W. A., Krugman S. The resurgence of measles in the United States, 1989-1990. Annu Rev Med. 1992;43:451–463. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.43.020192.002315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bean J. A., Burmeister L. F., Paule C. L., Isacson P. A comparison of national infection and immunization estimates for measles and rubella. Am J Public Health. 1978 Dec;68(12):1214–1216. doi: 10.2105/ajph.68.12.1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarkson J. A., Fine P. E. The efficiency of measles and pertussis notification in England and Wales. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Mar;14(1):153–168. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cochi S. L., Edmonds L. E., Dyer K., Greaves W. L., Marks J. S., Rovira E. Z., Preblud S. R., Orenstein W. A. Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970-1985. On the verge of elimination. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Feb;129(2):349–361. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernandez de Castro J. Measles in Mexico. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 May-Jun;5(3):422–426. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.3.422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gindler J. S., Atkinson W. L., Markowitz L. E., Hutchins S. S. Epidemiology of measles in the United States in 1989 and 1990. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Oct;11(10):841–846. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199210000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hinman A. R., Brandling-Bennet A. D., Bernier R. H., Kirby C. D., Eddins D. L. Current features of measles in the United States: feasibility of measles elimination. Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:153–170. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horwitz O., Grünfeld K., Lysgaard-Hansen B., Kjeldsen K. The epidemiology and natural history of measles in Denmark. Am J Epidemiol. 1974 Aug;100(2):136–149. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Markowitz L. E., Preblud S. R., Orenstein W. A., Rovira E. Z., Adams N. C., Hawkins C. E., Hinman A. R. Patterns of transmission in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):75–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McGrath J., Driver B., Bridges-Webb C., Baker J., Hunter C. The incidence and notification of measles in Australia. Community Health Stud. 1989;13(2):156–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1989.tb00192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Orenstein W. A., Bernier R. H. Surveillance. Information for action. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1990 Jun;37(3):709–734. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36912-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutter R. W., Cochi S. L., Brink E. W., Sirotkin B. I. Assessment of vital statistics and surveillance data for monitoring tetanus mortality, United States, 1979-1984. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):132–142. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sutter R. W., Cochi S. L. Pertussis hospitalizations and mortality in the United States, 1985-1988. Evaluation of the completeness of national reporting. JAMA. 1992 Jan 15;267(3):386–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thacker S. B., Redmond S., Rothenberg R. B., Spitz S. B., Choi K., White M. C. A controlled trial of disease surveillance strategies. Am J Prev Med. 1986 Nov-Dec;2(6):345–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vogt R. L., LaRue D., Klaucke D. N., Jillson D. A. Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jul;73(7):795–797. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES