Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1993 Nov;83(11):1599–1603. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.11.1599

Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics.

E S Tambor 1, G A Chase 1, R R Faden 1, G Geller 1, K J Hofman 1, N A Holtzman 1
PMCID: PMC1694880  PMID: 8238685

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. This study assessed efforts to increase response rates to a mailed physician survey and examined whether, as a result, nonresponse bias was reduced. METHODS. Randomly selected physicians and geneticists were mailed a questionnaire concerning genetics knowledge and attitudes. In the final but not the pilot survey, a $25 incentive and intensive follow-up were used to increase the response rate. RESULTS. The response rate from physicians in the final survey was 64.8% (n = 1140), compared with 19.6% in the pilot test (n = 69). Sample representatives in sociodemographic and practice characteristics was improved by follow-up. Respondents recruited with more difficulty did not differ on the principal outcome variable, genetics knowledge, except on one subscore. Pilot study and final survey respondents did not differ in knowledge. CONCLUSIONS. Although the effect of increased response rates on the principal outcome variable in this study was minimal, this may not be the case for other studies. Every effort should be made to attain as high a response rate as is practical and to establish that respondents are representative of the population being sampled.

Full text

PDF
1599

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berk M. L. Interviewing physicians: the effect of improved response rate. Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1338–1340. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gough H. G., Hall W. B. A comparison of physicians who did or did not respond to a postal questionnaire. J Appl Psychol. 1977 Dec;62(6):777–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gunn W. J., Rhodes I. N. Physician response rates to a telephone survey: effects of monetary incentive level. Public Opin Q. 1981 Spring;45(1):109–115. doi: 10.1086/268638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hofman K. J., Tambor E. S., Chase G. A., Geller G., Faden R. R., Holtzman N. A. Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Acad Med. 1993 Aug;68(8):625–632. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199308000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Siemiatycki J., Campbell S. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):291–301. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES