Abstract
It is well known that female mate choice decisions depend on the direct costs of choosing (either because of search costs or male-imposed costs). Far less is known about how direct fitness costs affect male mate choice. We conducted an experiment to investigate male mate choice in a fish, the Pacific blue-eye (Pseudomugil signifer). Preferred females were larger, probably because larger females are also more fecund. Males, however, were consistent in their choice of female only when the costs of associating with prospective mates were equal. By contrast, males were far less consistent in their choice when made to swim against a current to remain with their initially preferred mate. Our results suggest that males may also respond adaptively to changes in the costs of choosing.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (72.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Engqvist L., Sauer K. P. Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):729–735. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jennions M. D., Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283–327. doi: 10.1017/s0006323196005014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Barton N. H. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1282–1286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokko Hanna, Brooks Robert, Jennions Michael D., Morley Josephine. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):653–664. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokko Hanna, Johnstone Rufus A. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):319–330. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotiaho J. S. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):365–376. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]