Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2006 Sep 6;44(11):4211–4213. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01304-06

Cholera Due to Altered El Tor Strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh

G Balakrish Nair 1,*, Firdausi Qadri 1, Jan Holmgren 2, Ann-Mari Svennerholm 2, Ashrafus Safa 1, Nurul A Bhuiyan 1, Q Shafi Ahmad 1, Shah M Faruque 1, A S G Faruque 1, Yoshifumi Takeda 3, David A Sack 1
PMCID: PMC1698305  PMID: 16957040

Abstract

We determined the types of cholera toxin (CT) produced by a collection of 185 Vibrio cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh over the past 45 years. All of the El Tor strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated since 2001 produced CT of the classical biotype, while those isolated before 2001 produced CT of the El Tor biotype.


Vibrio cholerae O1 has two biotypes, namely, classical and El Tor, which are believed to have evolved from separate lineages (7, 8), and these biotypes have traditionally been differentiated by a number of phenotypic traits. Comparative genomic analyses have recently revealed a high degree of conservation among diverse strains of V. cholerae but have also shown genes that differentiate the classical biotype from the El Tor biotype (3). Apart from these phenotypic and genetic differences, there are also dissimilarities in the infection patterns of disease caused by the two biotypes. These include the occurrence of more asymptomatic than symptomatic carriers of El Tor strains, who outnumber active patients by a ratio of up to 50:1 (14), better survival of El Tor strains in the environment and in the human host, and more efficient host-to-host transmission of El Tor strains than of classical strains (5). There is firm evidence that the fifth and sixth pandemics of cholera were caused by the classical biotype, while the ongoing seventh pandemic is caused by the El Tor biotype, which has now globally replaced the classical biotype.

Cholera toxin (CT), the principal toxin produced by V. cholerae O1 and O139, is responsible for most of the manifestations of the disease cholera. Based on the B subunit of CT, two immunologically related but not identical epitypes have been described: CT1 is the prototype elaborated by classical biotype strains and by U.S. Gulf Coast strains, while CT2 is produced by the El Tor biotype and O139 strains (4). Another classification identifies three types of ctxB genes based on three nonrandom base changes resulting in changes in the deduced amino acid sequence. Genotype 1 is found in strains of the classical biotype worldwide and in U.S. Gulf Coast strains, genotype 2 is found in El Tor biotype strains from Australia, and genotype 3 is found in El Tor biotype strains from the seventh pandemic and the Latin American epidemic (12). Thus, the V. cholerae O1 El Tor biotype of the ongoing seventh pandemic produces CT of the CT2 epitype and genotype 3, while the classical biotype CT belongs to the CT1 epitype and genotype 1. In this study, we examined a collection of clinical V. cholerae O1 strains isolated in Bangladesh during the past four and a half decades, using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) produced to classical and El Tor CTs, and found that V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains isolated since 2001 in Bangladesh produce the CT subtype of the classical biotype.

One hundred eighty-five strains of V. cholerae O1, consisting of 31 strains of the classical biotype isolated between 1960 and 1990 and 113 strains of the El Tor biotype and 41 hybrid strains of V. cholerae O1 (strains that could not be biotyped as El Tor or classical by conventional phenotypic tests) isolated between 1960 and 2005, were included in this study. These strains were selected from different months within a year and from different years from the ICDDR,B culture collection. All strains were isolated from cases of acute watery diarrhea in patients admitted to the cholera hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The identities of the strains were reconfirmed by the slide agglutination test using specific antisera (13). For biotype analysis, we used chicken erythrocyte agglutination, sensitivity to polymyxin B, and Mukerjee classical phage IV and Mukerjee El Tor phage 5 tests (11).

The detection of the CT subtype was performed by ganglioside GM1-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (15), using mouse MAbs specific for the CT subtype produced by the El Tor (ETC 31:20; MAb raised against the CT produced by El Tor strain N16961) or the classical (CT 21:15; MAb raised against the CT produced by classical strain 569B) biotype as well as a MAb that reacts with the CT subtypes of both biotypes (LT 39:13:1) (16). V. cholerae O1 was cultured in AKI medium at 37°C overnight (6). Optical densities of 0.4 or more above the background in the ELISA were considered positive. Nucleotide sequencing of the ctxB genes of eight strains of V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolated between 2001 and 2005 that produced the classical subtype of CT and multiple sequence alignment was performed as previously described (10). The nucleotide sequences of the reference strains were compared with the corresponding sequences of El Tor strain N16961 (GenBank accession no. NC-002505) and classical strain 569B (GenBank accession no. U25679), which were retrieved from GenBank by BLAST searches.

The CT subtypes of a total of 185 strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated over a period of 45 years were examined by the CT subtype-specific ELISA. As shown in Table 1, all 31 classical biotype strains produced CT of the classical subtype. All of the El Tor and hybrid strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated between 2001 and 2005 that were included in the study produced CT of the classical subtype. This is in contrast to the El Tor strains isolated from 1971 to 2000, which produced predominantly CT of the El Tor subtype.

TABLE 1.

Cholera toxin subtypes produced by different biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolated from 1960 to 2005, based on an ELISA using monoclonal antibodies specific to the El Tor and classical subtypes of CT

Biotype and isolation period (yr) No. of strains with CT subtype
Classical El Tor Both classical and El Tor No toxin
Classical
    1960-1990 31 0 0 0
El Tor
    1960-2000 6 51 0 7
    2001-2005 49 0 0 0
Hybrida
    1960-2000 13 15 2 7
    2001-2005 4 0 0 0
Total 103 66 2 14
a

The strains were biotyped based on conventional phenotypic traits, and those strains that could not be biotyped as El Tor or classical were labeled hybrid strains.

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the ctxB genes of eight representative El Tor strains of V. cholerae O1 isolated from 2001 to 2005 that produced CT of the classical subtype revealed that the strains possess DNA sequences identical to that of the classical type of ctxB. The deduced amino acid sequences of all eight representative El Tor O1 strains were aligned with the CtxB sequences of the reference strains N16961 (El Tor) and 569B (classical). The deduced amino acid sequences of all eight representative strains were found to be identical to the deduced amino acid sequence of the CT of the 569B classical reference strain, with a histidine at position 39 and a threonine at position 68 (Fig. 1), thereby confirming the results of the CT subtype-specific ELISA.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Amino acid sequence alignment of CT B subunits of representative El Tor V. cholerae isolates from Dhaka, Bangladesh, isolated between 2001 and 2005, that produced the classical subtype of CT, plotted relative to the El Tor reference (identical residues are indicated with dots). The amino acid sequences of the B subunits of V. cholerae 569B (classical) and N16961 (El Tor) were obtained from GenBank.

The epitype and genotype of the CT of the El Tor strains currently associated with cholera in Bangladesh have shifted from epitype CT2 and genotype 3 to epitype CT1 and genotype 1. Thus, in effect, the present El Tor biotype strains produce CT of the classical biotype. The production of classical CT by the El Tor biotype per se is not novel and has been reported infrequently (1, 11, 17). In fact, U.S. Gulf Coast clones of V. cholerae O1 are El Tor strains that possess the classical CT (12). What is novel in the present study is that El Tor strains producing classical CT have completely replaced the prototype seventh pandemic El Tor strains producing the El Tor CT in Bangladesh. Given that there are differences between the classical and El Tor biotypes, the selection of this altered type of strain seems to indicate an evolutionary optimization of the El Tor biotype and could represent a new, more efficient emerging form of the El Tor biotype of V. cholerae O1.

These altered El Tor biotype strains cannot be differentiated from other El Tor strains by currently used bacteriological methods, and therefore a revision in methods is needed to track the spread of such strains. The implications of the heterogeneity in the B subunit of the CTs of the altered El Tor strains also need to be assessed from a vaccine and diagnostic perspective. It has been shown that various polyclonal antisera raised against CT1 antigens neutralize CT2 considerably less effectively than they neutralize the homologous toxin (9). Vaccines partly based on the B subunit from classical strains have been shown to protect less efficiently against El Tor strains than against classical strains in field trials (2). How the altered El Tor biotype strains will influence the epidemiology of cholera remains to be seen.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequences obtained for the ctxB genes of strains MQ1687, AU29037, CIRS098, CIRS101, CIRS164, VC071, VC073, and R001 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers DQ523204 and DQ523217 to DQ523223.

Acknowledgments

This research study was funded by the ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research and its donors, who provide unrestricted support to the center for its operations and research. Current donors providing unrestricted support include the Australian International Development Agency (AusAID), the Government of Bangladesh, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the Government of The Netherlands, the Government of Sri Lanka, the Swedish International Development Cooperative Agency (Sida-SAREC), the Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC), and the Department for International Development, (DFID), United Kingdom. We gratefully acknowledge these donors for their support and commitment to the center's research efforts.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 6 September 2006.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ansaruzzaman, M., N. A. Bhuiyan, G. B. Nair, D. A. Sack, M. Lucas, J. L. Deen, J. Ampuero, C. L. Chaignat, and the Mozambique Cholera Vaccine Demonstration Project Coordination Group. 2004. Cholera in Mozambique, variant of Vibrio cholerae. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:2057-2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clemens, J. D., D. A. Sack, J. R. Harris, F. van Loon, J. Chakraborty, F. Ahmed, M. R. Rao, M. R. Khan, M. Yunus, N. Huda, B. F. Stanton, B. A. Kay, R. Eeckels, J. D. Clemens, M. R. Rao, B. A. Kay, D. A. Sack, J. R. Harris, B. F. Stanton, S. Walter, R. Eeckels, A.-M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren. 1990. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh: results from a three-year follow-up. Lancet 335:270-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dziejman, M., E. Balon, D. Boyd, C. M. Fraser, J. F. Heidelberg, and J. J. Mekalanos. 2002. Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1556-1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Finkelstein, R. A., F. Burks, A. Zupan, W. S. Dallas, C. O. Jacob, and D. S. Ludwig. 1987. Epitopes of the cholera family of enterotoxins. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9:544-561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Finkelstein, R. A. 25 February 2006, posting date. Cholera, Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139, and other pathogenic vibrios. [Online.] http://gsbs.utmb.edu/microbook/ch024.htm. [PubMed]
  • 6.Iwanaga, M., K. Yamamoto, N. Higa, Y. Ichinose, N. Nakasone, and M. Tanabe. 1986. Culture conditions for stimulating cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Microbiol. Immunol. 30:1075-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaper, J. B., H. B. Bradford, N. C. Roberts, and S. Falkow. 1982. Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae in the U.S. Gulf Coast. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16:129-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karaolis, D. K., R. Lan, and P. R. Reeves. 1995. The sixth and seventh cholera pandemics are due to independent clones separately derived from environmental, nontoxigenic, non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 177:3191-3198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marchlewicz, B. A., and R. A. Finkelstein. 1983. Immunological differences among the cholera/coli family of enterotoxins. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1:129-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mitra, R. K., R. K. Nandy, T. Ramamurthy, S. K. Bhattacharya, S. Yamasaki, T. Shimada, S. Toshio, Y. Takeda, and G. B. Nair. 2001. Molecular characterisation of rough variants of Vibrio cholerae isolated from hospitalised patients with diarrhoea. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:268-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nair, G. B., S. M. Faruque, N. A. Bhuiyan, M. Kamruzzaman, A. K. Siddique, and D. A. Sack. 2002. New variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor with attributes of the classical biotype from hospitalized patients with acute diarrhea in Bangladesh. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3296-3299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Olsvik, O., J. Wahlberg, B. Petterson, M. Uhlen, T. Popovic, I. K. Wachsmuth, and P. I. Fields. 1993. Use of automated sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-generated amplicons to identify three types of cholera toxin subunit B in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:22-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qadri, F., R. Raqib, F. Ahmed, T. Rahman, C. Wenneras, S. K. Das, N. H. Alam, M. M. Mathan, and A.-M. Svennerholm. 2002. Increased levels of inflammatory mediators in children and adults infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9:221-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sack, D. A., R. B. Sack, G. B. Nair, and A. K. Siddique. 2005. Cholera. Lancet 63:223-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Svennerholm, A.-M., and J. Holmgren. 1978. Identification of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin by means of a ganglioside immunosorbent assay (GM1-ELISA) procedure. Curr. Microbiol. 1:19-23. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Svennerholm, A.-M., M. Wikstrom, M. Lindblad, and J. Holmgren. 1986. Monoclonal antibodies to Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins: neutralising activity and differentiation of human and porcine LTs and cholera toxin. Med. Biol. 64:23-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tamplin, M. L., R. Jalali, M. K. Ahmed, and R. R. Colwell. 1990. Variation in epitopes of the B subunit of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 and Vibrio mimicus cholera toxins. Can. J. Microbiol. 36:409-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES