Abstract
Penicillium marneffei infection is an important disease among human immunodeficiency virus patients in Southeast Asia. The in vitro antifungal-drug susceptibilities of 29 clinical isolates and 5 isolates from bamboo rats collected from 2002 to 2004 were determined. The P. marneffei yeast form is more susceptible than the mycelial form to amphotericin B and ketoconazole, while the mycelial and yeast forms displayed similar susceptibilities to flucytosine and itraconazole. The MICs of fluconazole were higher for both mycelial and yeast forms.
Penicillium marneffei, the only known dimorphic species in the genus Penicillium, was first isolated from an organ of a bamboo rat (Rhizomyces sinensis or Rhizomyces pruinosis) (2). Penicilliosis marneffei has been recognized with increasing frequency in Southeast Asia and Southern China (15, 19, 20). P. marneffei infection has become the third most common opportunistic infection in AIDS patients in Southeast Asia (17, 22). Penicilliosis marneffei was first reported in Cambodia in 2002 (1). We report in vitro susceptibility test results, as determined using Etest strips, for P. marneffei isolates from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who presented with disseminated P. marneffei infections. We include the susceptibility test results for P. marneffei isolates from the organs of bamboo rats. Our study is the first from Cambodia to report in vitro susceptibilities of clinical and bamboo rat isolates of P. marneffei to antifungal agents.
P. marneffei was isolated from 29 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients seen at Preah Bat Norodom Sihanouk Hospital, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, from 2002 to 2004. Thirteen P. marneffei isolates were isolated from blood, 12 from skin biopsy specimens, and 4 from respiratory specimens. In all cases, only one specimen type was submitted to the laboratory. Bamboo rats (Rhizomyces pruinosus) were captured in the Mondulkiri province of Cambodia. Five isolates of P. marneffei were isolated from the lungs of 10 bamboo rats. P. marneffei was identified by the appearance of the fungal colonies on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 25°C and by microscopic examination (9).
One-week-old slant cultures of the mycelial form on Sabouraud dextrose agar, grown at 25°C, were flooded with deionized distilled water (10 ml/slant), and each slant was scraped with a sterile inoculation wire loop. The suspension of mycelial fragments and conidia was transferred to a glass grinder. After the grinding, a homogenous suspension was adjusted to 1 McFarland standard (11, 14). To obtain inocula of the yeast form, brain heart infusion broth (Difco) was inoculated with a fungal suspension prepared from 7-day-old slant cultures. The inoculated brain heart infusion flasks were placed on a water bath shaker (150 rpm) and incubated at 37°C for 7 days, yielding a uniform growth of yeast cells. After incubation, the broth cultures were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min (4°C). After the broth was discarded, the sediment was washed three times successively with sterile deionized distilled water. The washed yeast cells were suspended in deionized distilled water and adjusted to 1 McFarland standard. Etest strips (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) containing amphotericin B (AMB) (0.002 to 32 μg/ml), flucytosine (5FC) (0.002 to 32 μg/ml), fluconazole (FLC) (0.016 to 256 μg/ml), itraconazole (ITC) (0.002 to 32 μg/ml), and ketoconazole (KTC) (0.002 to 32 μg/ml) were used to determine the MICs according to the manufacturer's instructions. Susceptibility tests were carried out on RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Invitrogen Corporation, United Kingdom) supplemented with 1.5% agar and 2% glucose (12). Inoculated plates, including controls for the culture medium, were incubated at 25°C and 37°C for 72 h. The MIC was determined as the point of intersection of the elliptical inhibition zone with the scale on the E strip. Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from the National Collection of Microorganism Cultures (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), IP 960.67, IP 961.67, and IP 962.67, were included to confirm the reproducibility of the results. Statistical analysis was performed with the STATA software (Stata Corp.).
The results for the P. marneffei isolates from patients are presented in Table 1. The MICs of AMB for the mycelial form were higher than those recorded for the yeast form (geometric mean titers, 2.994 μg/ml and 0.122 μg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). The MICs of 5FC were lower for the mycelial form than for the yeast form (geometric mean titers, 0.004 μg/ml and 0.015 μg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). There was essentially no difference between the MICs of FLC for mycelial and yeast forms (geometric mean titers, 69.475 μg/ml and 43.504 μg/ml, respectively). The MICs of KTC were lower for the yeast form than for the mycelial form (geometric mean titers, 0.021 μg/ml and 0.400 μg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). The MICs of ITC were similar for the mycelial and yeast forms (geometric mean titers, 0.020 μg/ml and 0.007 μg/ml, respectively).
TABLE 1.
In vitro susceptibilities of 29 clinical isolates of Penicilium marneffei to antifungal drugs, flucytosine, amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole
P. marneiffei (n = 29) | Antifungal agent | MIC (μg/ml)
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric mean | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | ||
Mycelial (25°C) | Flucytosine | 0.004 | 0.002-0.032 | 0.003 | 0.016 |
Amphotericin B | 2.994 | 0.002-32.0 | 4.0 | 24.0 | |
Ketoconazole | 0.400 | 0.047-1.00 | 0.38 | 0.75 | |
Fluconazole | 69.475 | 16.0-256.0 | 64.0 | 192.0 | |
Itraconazole | 0.020 | 0.002-0.12 | 0.016 | 0.047 | |
Yeast (37°C) | Flucytosine | 0.015 | 0.002-0.019 | 0.012 | 0.094 |
Amphotericin B | 0.122 | 0.002-2.0 | 0.19 | 0.75 | |
Ketoconazole | 0.021 | 0.002-0.19 | 0.023 | 0.047 | |
Fluconazole | 43.504 | 1.50-256.0 | 32.0 | 128.0 | |
Itraconazole | 0.007 | 0.002-0.23 | 0.006 | 0.016 |
The in vitro activities of the agents against the P. marneffei isolates from bamboo rats are presented in Table 2. The MIC geometric means titers of 5FC, AMB, KTC, FLC, and ITC for both the mycelial and yeast forms of these isolates were similar to those for the clinical isolates.
TABLE 2.
In vitro susceptibilities of five Penicilium marneffei isolates from the lungs of bamboo rats to antifungal drugs, flucytosine, Amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole
P. marneiffei (n = 5) | Antifungal agent | MIC (μg/ml)
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Geometric mean | Range | ||
Mycelial (25°C) | Flucytosine | 0.008 | 0.004-0.047 |
Amphotericin B | 4.097 | 0.047-32.0 | |
Ketoconazole | 0.424 | 0.38-0.50 | |
Fluconazole | 71.060 | 24.0-256.0 | |
Itraconazole | 0.024 | 0.012-0.047 | |
Yeast (37°C) | Flucytosine | 0.073 | 0.032-0.25 |
Amphotericin B | 0.390 | 0.064-1.5 | |
Ketoconazole | 0.034 | 0.016-0.064 | |
Fluconazole | 91.582 | 32.0-256.0 | |
Itraconazole | 0.006 | 0.002-0.012 |
The consistent MICs of the antifungal agents against our control strains indicated that the reproducibility of our susceptibility test was excellent.
Our study demonstrates that the majority of mycelial or yeast forms of P. marneffei strains recovered from the patients showed greater susceptibility to 5FC and ITC. Our MIC data for 5FC and ITC are similar to those reported by Sekhon et al. (13). An in vitro study by McGinnis et al. (10) demonstrated that 30 strains of P. marneffei were susceptible to ITC (MICs, 0.03 to 0.5 μg/ml). In our study, the MICs of AMB and KTC for the mycelial forms of P. marneffei strains were more than 10 times higher than for yeast forms. The yeast forms, with the exception of one P. marneffei strain from a patient, were susceptible to AMB with an MIC geometric mean titer of 0.122 μg/ml. The majority of the isolates, from either patients or bamboo rats, in the mycelial and yeast form were resistant to FLC, with an MIC geometric mean titer of >43.504 μg/ml. This is similar to data reported by Supparatpinyo et al. (16). Several investigators have confirmed the reliability of the Etest strips for the determination of antifungal susceptibilities (3, 12, 21).
Our finding that the isolates of P. marneffei demonstrate greater susceptibility to ITC in the yeast or mycelial form has been reported by others (12, 13). Hardin et al. (5), in a pharmacokinetic study of ITC, demonstrated that the plasma concentration was approximately 0.5 μg/ml. As indicated by Sekhon et al. (13), ITC would be the drug of choice for treating penicilliosis marneffei. A study by Supparatpinyo et al. (18) indicated that long-term maintenance therapy with oral ITC at a dose of 200 mg once daily is highly effective in preventing relapse of P. marneffei infections. The in vivo pharmacokinetic data of Francis et al. (4) and Huang et al. (6) support our conclusion that 5FC and KTC may be effective alternate choices for the treatment of P. marneffei infections. Pankorn et al. (11) demonstrated that P. marneffei showed greater susceptibility to ITC and KTC, while AMB had only intermediate activity and FLC was least effective. Our AMB and FLC susceptibility data agree with those of Pankorn et al. (11) and are also supported by the pharmacokinetics of AMB and FLC in lung tissue, saliva, and plasma as reported by Koizumi et al. (7) and Koks et al. (8).
In Cambodia, AMB remains the agent of choice for the initial treatment of P. marneffei infection. This is followed after 2 or 3 weeks with oral ITC. Our in vitro results demonstrating susceptibility of the yeast phase to AMB and ITC support this protocol for the treatment of P. marneffei infection in Cambodia.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Jim McLaughlin for his constructive suggestions and helpful comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 13 September 2006.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bailloud, R., M. Sumanak, B. Sar, C. Y. Sreng, T. Ellman, D. Laureillard, and D. Monchy. 2002. Premiers cas d'infection à Penicillium marneffei identifiés chez l'immunodéprimé au Cambodge. J. Mycol. Med. 12:138-142. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Capponi, M., P. Sureau, and G. Sergetain. 1956. Penicilliose de Rhyzomys sinensis. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Filiales 49:418-421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cuenca-Estrella, M., A. Gomez-Lopez, E. Mellado, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2005. Correlation between the procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida spp. of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and four commercial techniques. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:486-492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Francis, P., and T. J. Walsh. 1992. Evolving role of flucytosine in immunocompromised patients—new insights into safety, pharmacokinetics, and antifungal therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:1003-1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hardin, C. T., R. J. Graybill, R. Fetchick, R. Woestenborghs, G. M. Rinaldi, and G. J. Kuhn. 1988. Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:1310-1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang, Y. C., L. J. Colaizzi, H. R. Bierman, R. Woestenborghs, and J. Heykants. 1986. Pharmacokinetic and dose proportionality of ketoconazole in normal volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 30:206-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koizumi, T., K. Kubo, T. Kaneki, M. Hanaoka, T. Hayano, T. Miyahara, K. Okada, K. Fujimoto, H. Yamamoto, T. Kobayashi, and M. Sekiguchi. 1998. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of amphotericin B in lung tissue: lung lymph distribution after intravenous injection and airspace distribution after aerosolization and inhalation of amphotericin B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1597-1600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koks, C. H. W., P. L. Meenhorst, M. J. X. Hillebrand, A. Bult, and J. H. Beijnen. 1996. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in saliva and plasma after administration of an oral suspension and capsules. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1935-1937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kudeken, N., K. Kawakami, and A. Saito. 1998. Different susceptibilities of yeasts and conidia of Penicillium marneffei to nitric oxide (NO)-mediated fungidal activity of murine macrophages. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 112:287-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McGinnis, M. R., N. G. Nordoff, N. S. Ryder, and G. B. Nunn. 2000. In vitro comparison of terbinafine and itraconazole against Penicillium marneffei. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1407-1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pankorn, I., K. Thipsuvan, A. Chaiprasert, S. Danchaivijitra. R. Sutthent., and J. Jearanaisilavong. 2000. Penicillium marneffei: type and drug susceptibility. Mycopathologia 149:109-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, A. Bolmström, F. C. Odds, and J. H. Rex. 1996. Multisite reproducibility of the Etest MIC method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1691-1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sekhon, A. S., A. A. Padhye, and A. K. Garg. 1992. In vitro sensitivity of Penicillium marneffei and Pythium insidiosum. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 8:427-432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sekhon, A. S., A. K. Garg, A. A. Padhye, and Z. Hamir. 1993. In vitro susceptibility of mycelial and yeast forms of Penicillium marneffei to amphotericin B, fluconazole, 5-fluorocytosine, and itraconazole. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 9:553-558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Supparatpinyo, K., S. Chiewchanvit, P. Hirunsri, C. Uthammachai, E. N. Kenrad, and T. Sirisanthana. 1992. Penicillium marneffei infection in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:871-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Supparatpinyo, K., E. N. Kenrad, G. M. William, J. B. Barbara, R. C. Chester, Jr., K. Chantana, and T. Sirisanthana. 1993. Response to antifungal therapy by human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with disseminated Penicillium marneffei infections and in vitro susceptibilities of isolates from clinical specimens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2407-2411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Supparatpinyo, K., and T. Sirisanthana. 1994. New fungal infections in the Western Pacific. JAMA Southeast Asia 10(Suppl.):208-209. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Supparatpinyo, K., J. Perriens, E. N. Kenrad, and T. Sirisanthana. 1998. A controlled trial of itraconazole to prevent relapse of Penicillium marneffei infection in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:1739-1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tsang, D. N., P. C. Li, M. S. Tsui, Y. T. Lau, K. E. Ma, and E. K. Yeoh. 1991. Penicillium marneffei: another pathogen to consider in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Rev. Infect. Dis. 13:766-767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsui, W. N., K. F. Ma., and D. N. Tsang. 1992. Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection in HIV-infected subject. Histopathology 20:287-293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vandenbossche, I., M. Vaneechoutte, M. Vandevenne, T. D. Baere, and G. Verschraegen. 2002. Susceptibility testing of fluconazole by the NCCLS broth macrodilution method, E-test, and disk diffusion for application in routine laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:918-921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walsh, T. J., and A. H. Groll. 1999. Emerging fungal pathogens: evolving challenges to immunocompromised patients for the twenty-first century. Transplant. Infect. Dis. 1:247-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]