Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1970 Jul 25;3(5716):181–188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5716.181

Host Resistance and Survival in Carcinoma of Breast: A Study of 104 Cases of Medullary Carcinoma in a Series of 1,411 Cases of Breast Cancer Followed for 20 years*

H J G Bloom, W W Richardson, J R Field
PMCID: PMC1701103  PMID: 5448777

Abstract

This paper deals with a special type of mammary carcinoma, generally of high-grade malignancy, which carries a remarkably good prognosis—the so-called “medullary carcinoma of the breast with lymphoid infiltrate.” Probably the increased lymphoid tissue seen in these tumours is concerned with cell-mediated and humoral immunological reactions and reflects a strong host-defence mechanism which is responsible for the remarkably high survival rates following radical treatment. Since the evidence for host resistance to malignant disease is based largely on animal data, the opportunity to study a group of patients followed for 20 years, in whom this type of defence reaction appears to exist, is of considerable clinical interest.

Among 1,411 cases of breast cancer there were 104 with medullary carcinoma (7·4%), for which the corrected 5- to 20-year survival rates have been calculated. After 20 years 74% of cases with operable medullary tumours were alive, compared with 14% of cases with similar stage non-medullary cancer. In the presence of histologically proved axillary metastases the 20-year survival rate was 61% for medullary cases, compared with only 13% for other types of breast cancer.

In 30 cases of medullary cancer in which the axilla was free, the corrected 20-year survival rate was 95% following a combination of radical operation and radiotherapy. No evidence could be found that axillary dissection or postoperative irradiation is harmful to women with operable highly malignant breast cancer in whom a well-marked host resistance is thought to be present. A combination of radical mastectomy and postoperative irradiation appears to be the most effective treatment for such cases. The present grounds for rejecting a radical approach to treatment of breast cancer, based on current immunological considerations, are regarded as being quite inadequate.

Full text

PDF
181

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERKSON J., GAGE R. P. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1950 May 24;25(11):270–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLACK M. M., OPLER S. R., SPEER F. D. Survival in breast cancer cases in relation to the structure of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955 May;100(5):543–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BLACK M. M., SPEER F. D., OPLER S. R. Structural representations of tumor-host relationships in mammary carcinoma; biologic and prognostic significance. Am J Clin Pathol. 1956 Mar;26(3):250–265. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/26.3.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BLACK M. M., SPEER F. D. Sinus histiocytosis of lymph nodes in cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958 Feb;106(2):163–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BLOOM H. J. G. Further studies on prognosis of breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1950 Dec;4(4):347–367. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1950.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BLOOM H. J. G. Prognosis in carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer. 1950 Sep;4(3):259–288. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1950.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BLOOM H. J., RICHARDSON W. W., HARRIES E. J. Natural history of untreated breast cancer (1805-1933). Comparison of untreated and treated cases according to histological grade of malignancy. Br Med J. 1962 Jul 28;2(5299):213–221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5299.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BLOOM H. J., RICHARDSON W. W. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 1957 Sep;11(3):359–377. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1957.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BLOOM H. J. THE INFLUENCE OF DELAY ON THE NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER: A STUDY OF CASES FOLLOWED FOR FIVE TO TWENTY YEARS. Br J Cancer. 1965 Jun;19:228–262. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1965.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. BLOOM H. J. The value of histology in the prognosis and classification of breast cancer. Proc R Soc Med. 1958 Feb;51(2):122–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Benninghoff D. L., Tyler R. W., Everett N. B. Repopulation of irradiated lymph nodes by recirculating lymphocytes. Radiat Res. 1969 Feb;37(2):381–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Black M. M., Asire A. J. Palpable axillary lymph nodes in cancer of the breast. Structural and biologic considerations. Cancer. 1969 Feb;23(2):251–259. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196902)23:2<251::aid-cncr2820230202>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. CRILE G., Jr RATIONALE OF SIMPLE MASTECTOMY WITHOUT RADIATION FOR CLINICAL STAGE 1 CANCER OF THE BREAST. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965 May;120:975–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. CULTER S. J., BLACK M. M., GOLDENBERG I. S. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN CANCER OF THE FEMALE BREAST. I. AN INVESTIGATION OF SOME INTERRELATIONS. Cancer. 1963 Dec;16:1589–1597. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196312)16:12<1589::aid-cncr2820161211>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crile G., Jr Results of simple mastectomy without irradiation in the treatment of operative stage I cancer of the breast. Ann Surg. 1968 Sep;168(3):330–336. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196809000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Crile G., Jr The smaller the cancer, the bigger the operation? Rationale of small operations for small tumors and large operations for large tumors. JAMA. 1967 Mar 6;199(10):736–738. doi: 10.1001/jama.199.10.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cutler S. J., Zippin C., Asire A. J. The prognostic significance of palpable lymph nodes in cancer of the breast. Cancer. 1969 Feb;23(2):243–250. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196902)23:2<243::aid-cncr2820230201>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairley G. H. Immunity to malignant disease in man. Br Med J. 1969 May 24;2(5655):467–473. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5655.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. GERSHON-COHEN J., BERGER S. M., KLICKSTEIN H. S. ROENTGENOGRAPHY OF BREAST CANCER MODERATING CONCEPT OF "BIOLOGIC PREDETERMINISM". Cancer. 1963 Aug;16:961–964. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196308)16:8<961::aid-cncr2820160802>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. HADDOW A., ALEXANDER P. AN IMMUNOLOGICAL METHOD OF INCREASING THE SENSITIVITY OF PRIMARY SARCOMAS TO LOCAL IRRADIATION WITH X RAYS. Lancet. 1964 Feb 29;1(7331):452–457. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)90793-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. HALL J. G., MORRIS B. EFFECT OF X-IRRADIATION OF THE POPLITEAL LYMPH-NODE ON ITS OUTPUT OF LYMPHOCYTES AND IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS. Lancet. 1964 May 16;1(7342):1077–1080. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)91274-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamlin I. M. Possible host resistance in carcinoma of the breast: a histological study. Br J Cancer. 1968 Sep;22(3):383–401. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1968.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kister S. J., Sommers S. C., Haagenses C. D., Friedell G. H., Cooley E., Varma A. Nuclear grade and sinus histiocytosis in cancer of the breast. Cancer. 1969 Mar;23(3):570–575. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196903)23:3<570::aid-cncr2820230307>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. LANE N., GOKSEL H., SALERNO R. A., HAAGENSEN C. D. Clinico-pathologic analysis of the surgical curability of breast cancers: a minimum ten-year study of a personal series. Ann Surg. 1961 Apr;153:483–498. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196104000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morton D. L., Malmgren R. A. Human osteosarcomas: immunologic evidence suggesting an associated infectious agent. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1279–1281. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Proudfoot A. T., Brown S. S. Acidaemia and salicylate poisoning in adults. Br Med J. 1969 May 31;2(5656):547–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5656.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rissanen P. M. A comparison of conservative and radical surgery combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of stage I carcinoma of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1969 Jun;42(498):423–426. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-42-498-423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stewart T. H. The presence of delayed hypersensitivity reactions in patients toward cellular extracts of their malignant tumors. 2. A correlation between the histologic picture of lymphocyte infiltration of the tumor stroma, the presence of such a reaction, and a discussion of the significance of this phenomenon. Cancer. 1969 Jun;23(6):1380–1387. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196906)23:6<1380::aid-cncr2820230620>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. URBAN J. A. SURGICAL EXCISION OF INTERNAL MAMMARY NODES FOR BREAST CANCER. Br J Surg. 1964 Mar;51:209–212. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800510311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wolff B. Histological grading in carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer. 1966 Mar;20(1):36–40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1966.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES