Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1970 Apr;38(4):758–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb09885.x

The effects of cholinomimetic drugs on responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation and noradrenaline in the rabbit ear artery

M J Rand, B Varma
PMCID: PMC1702590  PMID: 5441788

Abstract

1. The effects of infusions of the cholinomimetic drugs acetylcholine, methacholine, muscarine, carbachol, arecoline and pilocarpine were examined on vasoconstrictor responses of the perfused rabbit ear artery to sympathetic nerve stimulation and to injections of noradrenaline.

2. The first effect of very low concentrations of acetylcholine or muscarine was a slight enhancement of responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation, but when higher concentrations of acetylcholine, methacholine, muscarine, carbachol and arecoline were infused, these vasoconstrictor responses were decreased. With still higher concentrations the responses tended to increase in size during the infusion. After stopping an infusion, the depressed vasoconstrictor responses rapidly recovered and became enhanced.

3. Infusions of pilocarpine in a wide range of concentrations generally caused enhancement of responses.

4. The depressant effects of cholinomimetic drugs on the responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation were antagonized by atropine. Larger concentrations of the drugs overcame the blockade by atropine.

5. The effects of acetylcholine, methacholine and muscarine on the responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation were more pronounced at low than at high frequencies of stimulation.

6. Vasoconstrictor responses to injected noradrenaline were enhanced by acetylcholine or methacholine, whereas responses to sympathetic nerve stimulation were decreased by the same concentrations of these choline esters.

7. It is suggested that cholinomimetic drugs may act on receptor sites associated with the adrenergic terminal axon and that they may facilitate or impair the release of noradrenaline and impair noradrenaline uptake.

Full text

PDF
758

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENTLEY G. A. Studies on sympathetic mechanisms in isolated intestinal and vas deferens preparations. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1962 Aug;19:85–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1962.tb01429.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BIRMINGHAM A. T., WILSON A. B. AN ANALYSIS OF THE BLOCKING ACTION OF DIMETHYLPHENYLPIPERAZINIUM IODINE ON THE INHIBITION OF ISOLATED SMALL INTESTINE PRODUCED BY STIMULATION OF SYMPATHETIC NERVES. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Apr;24:375–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb01725.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BURN J. H., RAND M. J. Excitatory action of the vagus in the isolated atria in relation to adrenaline. J Physiol. 1958 Jun 18;142(1):173–186. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BURN J. H., RAND M. J. Sympathetic postganglionic cholinergic fibres. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1960 Mar;15:56–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1960.tb01210.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabrera R., Torrance R. W., Viveros H. The action of acetyl choline and other drugs upon the terminal parts of the postganglionic sympathetic fibre. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1966 May;27(1):51–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01641.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De la Lande I. S., Rand M. J. A simple isolated nerve-blood vessel preparation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Oct;43(5):639–656. doi: 10.1038/icb.1965.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Douglas W. W., Kanno T., Sampson S. R. Effects of acetylcholine and other medullary secretagogues and antagonists on the membrane potential of adrenal chromaffin cells: an analysis employing techniques of tissue culture. J Physiol. 1967 Jan;188(1):107–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FERRY C. B. The synpathomimetic effect of acetylcholine on the spleen of the cat. J Physiol. 1963 Jul;167:487–504. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gay W. S., Rand M. J., Ross P. A screening method for vasodilator drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1969 Jun;21(6):374–378. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1969.tb08270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUKOVIC S. The action of sympathetic blocking agents on isolated and innervated atria and vessels. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1960 Mar;15:117–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1960.tb01218.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindmar R., Löffelholz K., Muscholl E. A muscarinic mechanism inhibiting the release of noradrenaline from peripheral adrenergic nerve fibres by nicotinic agents. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1968 Feb;32(2):280–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00972.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MCGREGOR D. D. THE EFFECT OF SYMPATHETIC NERVE STIMULATION OF VASOCONSTRICTOR RESPONSES IN PERFUSED MESENTERIC BLOOD VESSELS OF THE RAT. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:21–30. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malik K. U., Ling G. M. Modification by acetylcholine of the response of rat mesenteric arteries to sympathetic stimulation. Circ Res. 1969 Jul;25(1):1–9. doi: 10.1161/01.res.25.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TAKESHIGE C., VOLLE R. L. MODIFICATION OF GANGLIONIC RESPONSES TO CHOLINOMIMETIC DRUGS FOLLOWING PREGANGLIONIC STIMULATION, ANTICHOLINESTERASE AGENTS AND PILOCARPINE. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1964 Dec;146:335–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES