Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1970 Jan;38(1):117–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10341.x

Properties of cholinoceptive neurones in the medial geniculate nucleus

A K Tebēcis
PMCID: PMC1702632  PMID: 5413282

Abstract

1. Acetylcholine (ACh), other cholinomimetics, cholinesterase inhibitors and cholinergic antagonists were administered iontophoretically to medial geniculate (MG) neurones and their effects on chemically or neurally evoked responses recorded extracellularly.

2. Acetylcholine had excitant actions on 45% of the neurones tested. Most of these were of a slow time course. Desensitization to the excitant effects was frequently observed.

3. Acetylcholine excited 91% of neurones activated antidromically by stimulation of the auditory cortex, 71% of neurones activated synaptically from the auditory cortex, 74% of neurones activated from the inferior colliculus and 100% of geniculo-cortical relay neurones.

4. Acetylcholine had depressant effects, which were generally of a rapid time course, on 29% of MG neurones. No desensitization to the depressant effects was observed.

5. On 4% of neurones, ACh had both excitant and depressant effects. Such “dual” effects were manifested either as an initial excitation followed by a depression, or as a depression followed by an excitation.

6. Eserine, neostigmine and edrophonium potentiated both excitant and depressant actions of ACh on many cells. Neostigmine and edrophonium occasionally antagonized the effects of ACh.

7. Atropine, hyoscine, dihydro-β-erythroidine, hexamethonium and (+)-tubocurarine antagonized both excitant and depressant effects of ACh. The muscarinic blocking agents were usually more effective than the nicotinic agents.

8. Carbamylcholine, acetyl-β-methylcholine, nicotine, butyrylcholine, arecoline and pilocarpine had excitant, depressant or no effects on MG neurones. Generally, carbamylcholine was more potent than acetyl-β-methylcholine and ACh, which were more potent than nicotine. Butyrylcholine, arecoline and pilocarpine were even less potent, often having no effect.

9. The cholinomimetics generally had similar effects to those of ACh on the same neurones, but sometimes were quite different. Carbamylcholine, acetyl-β-methylcholine and nicotine antagonized the effects of ACh on some neurones.

10. The results suggest that cholinoceptive receptors on MG neurones are not homogeneous. Although there are possibly some purely muscarinic and purely nicotinic receptors, the majority appear to be of intermediate muscarinic-nicotinic type. These mediate either excitation or inhibition.

Full text

PDF
117

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDERSEN P., CURTIS D. R. THE EXCITATION OF THALAMIC NEURONES BY ACETYLCHOLINE. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 May-Jun;61:85–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1964.tb02945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSEN P., CURTIS D. R. THE PHARMACOLOGY OF THE SYNAPTIC AND ACETYLCHOLINE-INDUCED EXCITATION OF VENTROBASAL THALAMIC NEURONES. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 May-Jun;61:100–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1964.tb02946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ANDERSEN P., ECCLES J. C., SEARS T. A. THE VENTRO-BASAL COMPLEX OF THE THALAMUS: TYPES OF CELLS, THEIR RESPONSES AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION. J Physiol. 1964 Nov;174:370–399. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian H. O., Lifschitz W. M., Tavitas R. J., Galli F. P. Activity of neural units in medial geniculate body of cat and rabbit. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1046–1060. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aitkin L. M., Dunlop C. W. Inhibition in the medial geniculate body of the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1969;7(1):68–83. doi: 10.1007/BF00236108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aitkin L. M., Dunlop C. W., Webster W. R. Click-evoked response patterns of single units in the medial geniculate body of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Jan;29(1):109–123. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.1.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Avanzino G. L., Bradley P. B., Wolstencroft J. H. Pharmacological properties of neurons of the paramedian reticular nucleus. Experientia. 1966 Jun 15;22(6):410–410. doi: 10.1007/BF01901170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BRADLEY P. B., WOLSTENCROFT J. H. ACTIONS OF DRUGS ON SINGLE NEURONES IN THE BRAIN-STEM. Br Med Bull. 1965 Jan;21:15–18. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BURGEN A. S. V., CHIPMAN L. M. The location of cholinesterase in the central nervous system. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1952;37(2):61–74. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1952.sp000983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Biscoe T. J., Straughan D. W. Micro-electrophoretic studies of neurones in the cat hippocampus. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):341–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyd E. S., Meritt D. A., Aroesty S., Celso M. Effects of gallamine and physostigmine on transmission through the cuneate nucleus. Am J Physiol. 1969 Mar;216(3):542–546. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.216.3.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. CURTIS D. R., ECCLES R. M. The effect of diffusional barriers upon the pharmacology of cells within the central nervous system. J Physiol. 1958 May 28;141(3):446–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. CURTIS D. R., ECCLES R. M. The excitation of Renshaw cells by pharmacological agents applied electrophoretically. J Physiol. 1958 May 28;141(3):435–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Comis S. D., Whitfield I. C. Influence of centrifugal pathways on unit activity in the cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Jan;31(1):62–68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crawford J. M., Curtis D. R. Pharmacological studies on feline Betz cells. J Physiol. 1966 Sep;186(1):121–138. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawford J. M., Curtis D. R., Voorhoeve P. E., Wilson V. J. Acetylcholine sensitivity of cerebellar neurones in the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Sep;186(1):139–165. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Curtis D. R., Ryall R. W. The acetylcholine receptors of Renshaw cells. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(1):66–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00234361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Curtis D. R., Ryall R. W. The excitation of Renshaw cells by cholinomimetics. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(1):49–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00234360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Curtis D. R., Ryall R. W. The synaptic excitation of Renshaw cells. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(1):81–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00234362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. GALAMBOS R., ROSE J. E., BROMILEY R. B., HUGHES J. R. Microelectrode studies on medial geniculate body of cat. II. Response to clicks. J Neurophysiol. 1952 Sep;15(5):359–380. doi: 10.1152/jn.1952.15.5.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. GROSS N. B., THURLOW W. R. Microelectrode studies of neural auditory activity of cat. II. Medial geniculate body. J Neurophysiol. 1951 Sep;14(5):409–422. doi: 10.1152/jn.1951.14.5.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Galindo A., Krnjević K., Schwartz S. Patterns of firing in cuneate neurones and some effects of Flaxedil. Exp Brain Res. 1968;5(2):87–101. doi: 10.1007/BF00238699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. HEBB C. O., SILVER A. Choline acetylase in the central nervous system of man and some other mammals. J Physiol. 1956 Dec 28;134(3):718–728. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Halpern L. M., Black R. G. Gallamine triethiodide facilitation of local cortical excitability compared with other neuromuscular blocking agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968 Jul;162(1):166–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. KOELLE G. B. The histochemical localization of cholinesterases in the central nervous system of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1954 Feb;100(1):211–235. doi: 10.1002/cne.901000108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. KRNJEVIC K., PHILLIS J. W. Acetylcholine-sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:296–327. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kehoe J. Single presynaptic neurone mediates a two component postsynaptic inhibition. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):866–868. doi: 10.1038/221866a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krnjević K., Phillis J. W. Pharmacological properties of acetylcholine-sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex. J Physiol. 1963 May;166(2):328–350. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. MCCANCE I., PHILLIS J. W. THE LOCATION OF MICROELECTRODE TIPS IN NERVOUS TISSUES. Experientia. 1965 Feb 15;21:108–109. doi: 10.1007/BF02144771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Macintosh F. C. The distribution of acetylcholine in the peripheral and the central nervous system. J Physiol. 1941 Jun 30;99(4):436–442. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1941.sp003913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McCance I., Phillis J. W., Tebécis A. K., Westerman R. A. The pharmacology of acetylcholine-excitation of thalamic neurones. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1968 Mar;32(3):652–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00464.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McCance I., Phillis J. W., Westerman R. A. Acetylcholine-sensitivity of thalamic neurones: its relationship to synaptic transmission. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1968 Mar;32(3):635–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1968.tb00463.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. NELSON P. G., ERULKAR S. D. SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS OF EXCITATION AND INHIBITION IN THE CENTRAL AUDITORY PATHWAY. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:908–923. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Phillis J. W., Tebecis A. K., York D. H. A study of cholinoceptive cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):695–713. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Phillis J. W., Tebècis A. K. The effects of pentobarbitone sodium on acetylcholine excitation and noradrenaline inhibition of thalamic neurons. Life Sci. 1967 Aug 1;6(15):1621–1625. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Phillis J. W., Tebècis A. K., York D. H. The inhibitory action of monoamines on lateral geniculate neurones. J Physiol. 1967 Jun;190(3):563–581. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roberts M. H., Straughan D. W. Actions of noradrenaline and mescaline on cortical neurons. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1968;259(2):191–192. doi: 10.1007/BF00537781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Roberts M. H., Straughan D. W. Excitation and depression of cortical neurones by 5-hydroxytryptamine. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(2):269–294. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. SALMOIRAGHI G. C., STEINER F. A. Acetylcholine sensitivity of cat's medullary neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jul;26:581–597. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.4.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Salmoiraghi G. C., Stefanis C. N. Patterns of central neurons responses to suspected transmitters. Arch Ital Biol. 1965 Dec 10;103(4):705–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Satinsky D. Pharmacological responsiveness of lateral geniculate nucleus neurons. Int J Neuropharmacol. 1967 Sep;6(5):387–397. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(67)90030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shute C. C., Lewis P. R. The ascending cholinergic reticular system: neocortical, olfactory and subcortical projections. Brain. 1967 Sep;90(3):497–520. doi: 10.1093/brain/90.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tebecis A. K. Are 5-hydroxytryptamine and noradrenaline inhibitory transmitters in the medial geniculate nucleus? Brain Res. 1967 Dec;6(4):780–782. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tebecis A. K. Studies on cholinergic transmission in the medial geniculate nucleus. Br J Pharmacol. 1970 Jan;38(1):138–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10342.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. VERNIER V. G., GALAMBOS R. Response of single medial geniculate units to repetitive click stimuli. Am J Physiol. 1957 Feb;188(2):233–237. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.188.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wachtel H., Kandel E. R. A direct synaptic connection mediating both excitation and inhibition. Science. 1967 Dec 1;158(3805):1206–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3805.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Watanabe T., Yanagisawa K., Kanzaki J., Katsuki Y. Cortical efferent flow influencing unit responses of medial geniculate body to sound stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(4):302–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00234776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yamamoto C. Pharmacologic studies of norepinephrine, acetylcholine and related compounds on neurons in Deiters' nucleus and the cerebellum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1967 Apr;156(1):39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES