Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1996 Mar;3(2):200–204. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.2.200-204.1996

Diagnostic value of the indirect immunofluorescence assay in cat scratch disease with Bartonella henselae and Afipia felis antigens.

M P Amerein 1, D De Briel 1, B Jaulhac 1, P Meyer 1, H Monteil 1, Y Piemont 1
PMCID: PMC170278  PMID: 8991636

Abstract

Serum samples from 35 cat scratch disease (CSD) patients, 180 control patients (123 without lymph node enlargement and 57 with lymph node enlargement not evoking CSD), and 102 nonpatient subjects (35 with cat contact and 67 without cat contact) were tested by semiquantitative indirect immunofluorescence assay for the presence of antibodies directed to Afipia felis (ATCC 53690T) or Bartonella henselae (ATCC 49882T). The CSD group had statistically higher antibody titers against B. henselae than the control groups (P < 10(-5)), whereas no difference in A. felis antibody titers was evidenced among all groups tested. Among the 317 serum samples studied, the three with high A. felis antibody titers ( > or = 64) also had high antibody titers against other alpha-2 proteobacteria. The value of the indirect immunofluorescence assay with B. henselae antigen for the diagnosis of CSD was as follows: for a cutoff of 32, sensitivity was 0.80, specificity was 0.85, and the likelihood ratio was 5.1; for a cutoff of 64, the likelihood ratio was 12.1. In summary, in France, CSD is associated with high antibody titers against B. henselae, as previously described in the United States. However, the causes for B. henselae seronegativity in CSD patients and those for high antibody titers outside the typical nosological frame of CSD still have to be identified.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alkan S., Morgan M. B., Sandin R. L., Moscinski L. C., Ross C. W. Dual role for Afipia felis and Rochalimaea henselae in cat-scratch disease. Lancet. 1995 Feb 11;345(8946):385–385. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson B., Kelly C., Threlkel R., Edwards K. Detection of Rochalimaea henselae in cat-scratch disease skin test antigens. J Infect Dis. 1993 Oct;168(4):1034–1036. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.4.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson B., Sims K., Regnery R., Robinson L., Schmidt M. J., Goral S., Hager C., Edwards K. Detection of Rochalimaea henselae DNA in specimens from cat scratch disease patients by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):942–948. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.942-948.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barka N. E., Hadfield T., Patnaik M., Schwartzman W. A., Peter J. B. EIA for detection of Rochalimaea henselae-reactive IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies in patients with suspected cat-scratch disease. J Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;167(6):1503–1504. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.6.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergmans A. M., Groothedde J. W., Schellekens J. F., van Embden J. D., Ossewaarde J. M., Schouls L. M. Etiology of cat scratch disease: comparison of polymerase chain reaction detection of Bartonella (formerly Rochalimaea) and Afipia felis DNA with serology and skin tests. J Infect Dis. 1995 Apr;171(4):916–923. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.4.916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenner D. J., Hollis D. G., Moss C. W., English C. K., Hall G. S., Vincent J., Radosevic J., Birkness K. A., Bibb W. F., Quinn F. D. Proposal of Afipia gen. nov., with Afipia felis sp. nov. (formerly the cat scratch disease bacillus), Afipia clevelandensis sp. nov. (formerly the Cleveland Clinic Foundation strain), Afipia broomeae sp. nov., and three unnamed genospecies. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2450–2460. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2450-2460.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenner D. J., O'Connor S. P., Winkler H. H., Steigerwalt A. G. Proposals to unify the genera Bartonella and Rochalimaea, with descriptions of Bartonella quintana comb. nov., Bartonella vinsonii comb. nov., Bartonella henselae comb. nov., and Bartonella elizabethae comb. nov., and to remove the family Bartonellaceae from the order Rickettsiales. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;43(4):777–786. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-4-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carithers H. A. Cat-scratch disease. An overview based on a study of 1,200 patients. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Nov;139(11):1124–1133. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140130062031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cherry W. B., Pittman B., Harris P. P., Hebert G. A., Thomason B. M., Thacker L., Weaver R. E. Detection of Legionnaires disease bacteria by direct immunofluorescent staining. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Sep;8(3):329–338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.329-338.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DEBRE R., LAMY M., JAMMET M. L., COSTIL L., MOZZICONACCI P. La maladies des griffes de chat. Sem Hop. 1950 May 30;26(40):1895–1904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dolan M. J., Wong M. T., Regnery R. L., Jorgensen J. H., Garcia M., Peters J., Drehner D. Syndrome of Rochalimaea henselae adenitis suggesting cat scratch disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Mar 1;118(5):331–336. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-5-199303010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koehler J. E., Glaser C. A., Tappero J. W. Rochalimaea henselae infection. A new zoonosis with the domestic cat as reservoir. JAMA. 1994 Feb 16;271(7):531–535. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.7.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lucey D., Dolan M. J., Moss C. W., Garcia M., Hollis D. G., Wegner S., Morgan G., Almeida R., Leong D., Greisen K. S. Relapsing illness due to Rochalimaea henselae in immunocompetent hosts: implication for therapy and new epidemiological associations. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;14(3):683–688. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.3.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margileth A. M., Wear D. J., English C. K. Systemic cat scratch disease: report of 23 patients with prolonged or recurrent severe bacterial infection. J Infect Dis. 1987 Mar;155(3):390–402. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Patnaik M., Schwartzman W. A., Barka N. E., Peter J. B. Possible role of Rochalimaea henselae in pathogenesis of AIDS encephalopathy. Lancet. 1992 Oct 17;340(8825):971–971. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92855-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Regnery R. L., Olson J. G., Perkins B. A., Bibb W. Serological response to "Rochalimaea henselae" antigen in suspected cat-scratch disease. Lancet. 1992 Jun 13;339(8807):1443–1445. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92032-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rossing R. G., Hatcher W. E. A graphic method for the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Methods Inf Med. 1980 Jul;19(3):149–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Verbon A., Weverling G. J., Kuijper S., Speelman P., Jansen H. M., Kolk A. H. Evaluation of different tests for the serodiagnosis of tuberculosis and the use of likelihood ratios in serology. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Aug;148(2):378–384. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.2.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wear D. J., Margileth A. M., Hadfield T. L., Fischer G. W., Schlagel C. J., King F. M. Cat scratch disease: a bacterial infection. Science. 1983 Sep 30;221(4618):1403–1405. doi: 10.1126/science.6612349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zangwill K. M., Hamilton D. H., Perkins B. A., Regnery R. L., Plikaytis B. D., Hadler J. L., Cartter M. L., Wenger J. D. Cat scratch disease in Connecticut. Epidemiology, risk factors, and evaluation of a new diagnostic test. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 1;329(1):8–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307013290102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES