Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
. 1963 Feb;20(1):63–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01297.x

Facilitation of neuromuscular transmission by anticholinesterase drugs

L C Blaber
PMCID: PMC1703737  PMID: 13971349

Abstract

A close correlation has been shown to exist between the in vitro anticholinesterase potencies of ambenonium, neostigmine, methoxyambenonium and edrophonium chloride and their abilities to increase muscle contractions produced by close-arterial injections of acetylcholine. No correlation was found between the anticholinesterase potencies of the drugs and their potentiations of the maximal twitch in response to electrical stimulation, or their antagonisms of tubocurarine. It is concluded that some action, in addition to inhibition of cholinesterase, contributed to their facilitation at the neuromuscular junction, and it is suggested that this action may be at the prejunctional site.

Full text

PDF
63

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AXELSSON J., THESLEFF S. A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Jun 23;147(1):178–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLABER L. C., BOWMAN W. C. A comparison between the effects of edrophonium and choline in the skeletal muscles of the cat. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1959 Dec;14:456–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00949.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BLABER L. C., BOWMAN W. C. A comparison between the responses of avian and mammalian muscles to substances with facilitate neuromuscular transmission. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1962 Jul 1;138:185–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BLABER L. C., BOWMAN W. C. The interaction between benzoquinonium and anticholinesterases in skeletal muscle. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1962 Jul 1;138:90–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BLABER L. C., CUTHBERT A. W. Cholinesterases in the domestic fowl and the specificity of some reversible inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol. 1962 Feb;11:113–123. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(62)90098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown G. L. Action potentials of normal mammalian muscle. Effects of acetylcholine and eserine. J Physiol. 1937 Mar 5;89(2):220–237. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1937.sp003474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown G. L., Dale H. H., Feldberg W. Reactions of the normal mammalian muscle to acetylcholine and to eserine. J Physiol. 1936 Sep 8;87(4):394–424. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1936.sp003414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown G. L., Harvey A. M. Reactions of avian muscle to acetylcholine and eserine. J Physiol. 1938 Oct 14;94(1):101–117. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1938.sp003665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown G. L. The actions of acetylcholine on denervated mammalian and frog's muscle. J Physiol. 1937 Jun 3;89(4):438–461. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1937.sp003491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowan S. L. The action of eserine-like and curare-like substances on the responses of frog's nerve-muscle preparations to repetitive stimulation. J Physiol. 1938 Aug 15;93(3):215–262. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1938.sp003637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HOBBIGER F. The mechanism of anticurare action of certain neostigmine analogues. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1952 Jun;7(2):223–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1952.tb01317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUBBARD J. I., SCHMIDT R. F. Stimulation of motor nerve terminals. Nature. 1961 Sep 9;191:1103–1104. doi: 10.1038/1911103a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LANDS A. M., KARCZMAR A. G., HOWARD J. W., ARNOLD A. An evaluation of the pharmacologic actions of some bis-quaternary salts of basically substituted oxamides (WIN 8077 and analogs). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1955 Oct;115(2):185–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. OGSTON A. G. Removal of acetylcholine from a limited volume by diffusion. J Physiol. 1955 Apr 28;128(1):222–223. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. RANDALL L. O., LEHMANN G. Pharmacological properties of some neostigmine analogs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1950 May;99(1):16–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. RIKER W. F., Jr, ROBERTS J., STANDAERT F. G., FUJIMORI H. The motor nerve terminal as the primary focus for drug-in-duced facilitation of neuromuscular transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1957 Nov;121(3):286–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. RIKER W. F., Jr, WERNER G., ROBERTS J., KUPERMAN A. Pharmacologic evidence for the existence of a presynaptic event in neuromuscular transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959 Feb;125(2):150–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SMITH C. M., COHEN H. L., PELIKAN E. W., UNNA K. R. Mode of action of antagonists to curare. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1952 Aug;105(4):391–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WERNER G. Neuromuscular facilitation and antidromic discharges in motor nerves: their relation to activity in motor nerve terminals. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Mar;23:171–187. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.2.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WESCOE W. C., RIKER W. F., Jr, BROTHERS M. J. Studies on the interrelationship of certain cholinergic compounds; the pharmacology of 3-acetoxy phenyltrimethylammonium methylsulfate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949 Oct;97(2):190–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WESCOE W. C., RIKER W. F., Jr The pharmacology of anti-curare agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1951 Oct;54(3):438–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1951.tb39935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WILSON I. B. The interaction of tensilon and neostigmine with acetylcholinesterase. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1955 Dec 1;104(2):204–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES