Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
. 1963 Dec;21(3):414–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb02008.x

The effect of some new antihistamines on the anaphylactic microshock of the guinea-pig

H Herxheimer, E Stresemann
PMCID: PMC1703885  PMID: 14110740

Abstract

The dose/response curves for the protective effects of the new antihistamine compounds trimeprazine, 10-(3-diethylamino-2-methylpropyl)phenothiazine 1,1-dioxide hydrochloride (oxomemazine hydrochloride), cyproheptadine, homochlorcyclizine and methotrimeprazine against the anaphylactic microshock of the guinea-pig were similar to that of promethazine. The first three compounds, however, protected at lower doses than promethazine (5 to 10 μg/kg). The protective effect of cyproheptadine lasted longer than 24 hr.

Full text

PDF
414

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARMITAGE P., HERXHEIMER H., ROSA L. The protective action of antihistamines in the anaphylactic microshock of the guinea-pig. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1952 Dec;7(4):625–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1952.tb00730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HERXHEIMER H. Repeatable micro-shocks of constant strength in guinea-pig anaphylaxis. J Physiol. 1952 Jun;117(2):251–255. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES