Conventionally, the preparation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire is based on textbooks, one's own perception and similar forms used at other hospitals. This process often reflects the providers' perception of factors influencing satisfaction, perpetuating their shortcomings and not adequately dealing with necessary cultural and social variations.
Methods
Aravind Eye Care System in India, one of the highest volume eye care centres in the world, developed an innovative way of developing an in-patient satisfaction assessment tool. All the ‘suggestions and complaints’ of inpatients registered in a separate suggestion register during the year 1997 were scrutinised and grouped. To confirm that the groupings indeed reflected the patient's expectations and concerns, another survey through interviews was conducted on 50 patients and 50 staff (ophthalmologists, nurses, administrative staff) with the objective of finding out the patients' expectations, concerns and worries.
Findings
The 123 different complaints in the initial study and the results of the supplementary study were used to develop 12 different categories to assess patient satisfaction. These are:
Action(s) Taken
In order to monitor patient satisfaction objectively, questions were developed in the broad categories, piloted and developed as a standard questionnaire to grade responses on different point scales. Some additional information, such as age, gender and treatment, was also included for better analysis. The questionnaire also used very clear and simple language and was worded to elicit thoughtful responses.
Consequence of Action(s)
This process has helped to develop a standard questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction regularly in our hospital. The expectations are also understood as these change and are incorporated into the questionnaire from time to time. The results are presented to the hospital's Quality Council and during meetings of heads of departments with a view to taking corrective actions. Individual audits are also undertaken on high patient dissatisfaction areas. The impact is that our patients are more satisfied (our regular survey results confirms this) and we experience an average workload increase of 15% every year. The success of our assessment and improvement of patient satisfaction is because we take into account the patients' own views and perspectives.
Aravind Eye Hospital Quality Council
Dr P Namperumalsamy, Director Chair of the Council
Mr A K Sivakumar, Faculty-LAICO, Secretary
Dr G Venkataswamy, Chairman
Mr G Srinivasan, Secretary to Trust
Dr G Natchiar, Joint Director
Mr R D Thulasiraj, Executive Director
Dr M Srinivasan, Chief Medical Officer
Dr S Aravind, Administrator
Mr R Meenakshi Sundaram, Community Outreach Manager
Mr Ganesh Babu, EDP In-charge
Mrs R Alees Mary, Nursing Training Coordinator
Terms Of Reference
Aravind Quality Council is a Management Committee, which will meet once a month, to direct, monitor, and support the Quality Management Programmes in Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai.
The Council will approve Department level Quality Objectives and Performance Standards as they are developed or amended.
The Council will review and approve any major changes or re-organisation that is perceived as necessary for the quality improvement process.
-
The Council will review and approve requests for additional support relating to quality improvement. Such requests may include the following:
- Staffing
- Staff developments
- Equipment/instruments
- Space
- Re-organisation or re-structuring
The Council will review the impact of the various quality improvement measures.
The Council will approve the Quality Manual, which comprises Quality Principles and Quality Improvement Practice in Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai.
The ultimate aim of the whole process is to ensure zero defects in the services and a high level of patient satisfaction.
Aravind Eye Hospital In-patient Feedback Form
Patients' Feedback: Follow-up Actions
| Suggestions and Grievances | Actions taken |
|---|---|
Behaviour of Staff
|
|
Clear Information
|
|
Personal Attention and Care
|
|
Physical Facilities
|
|
Supportive Services
|
|
Cleanliness and Maintenance
|
|
Waiting Time
|
|
Charges
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
Footnotes
Derived from the supplementary study

