Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1997 Nov;4(6):723–726. doi: 10.1128/cdli.4.6.723-726.1997

Rapid diagnosis of pertussis in young infants: comparison of culture, PCR, and infant's and mother's serology.

E Grimprel 1, E Njamkepo 1, P Bégué 1, N Guiso 1
PMCID: PMC170648  PMID: 9384297

Abstract

The contribution of maternal pertussis serology comparing prepartum serum to serum collected during the infant's disease to the diagnosis of pertussis in infants was evaluated for 28 pairs of young infants with pertussis syndrome and their mothers and was compared to those of culture and PCR. Infants had a nasopharyngeal aspiration tested by PCR, and acute and convalescent sera were collected during their disease. Mothers had a first acute serum collected concomitantly with the infant's acute serum, and both acute sera were compared to a prepartum serum. Sera were analyzed by immunoblotting for the detection of anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies. Serological evidence of pertussis in infants was assessed as either an increase in anti-PT antibody levels between the mother's prepartum and acute sera or the presence of antibodies in the infant's acute serum and their absence in both the mother's acute and prepartum sera. Culture and PCR sensitivity were 43 and 89%, respectively. Most infants (18 of 24) had no pertussis antibody detectable in their acute sera, confirming a delayed immune response at this age. A comparison of infant's and mother's serology, using prepartum serum, rapidly confirmed the diagnosis in 57% of the cases. Although less sensitive than PCR, this serological method should be used for a rapid diagnosis of pertussis in young infants when culture and PCR are either not available or negative.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (140.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bass J. W., Stephenson S. R. The return of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Feb;6(2):141–144. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198702000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grimprel E., Bégué P., Anjak I., Betsou F., Guiso N. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, culture, and western immunoblot serology for diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2745–2750. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2745-2750.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guiso N., Grimprel E., Anjak I., Bégué P. Western blot analysis of antibody responses of young infants to pertussis infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Aug;12(8):596–600. doi: 10.1007/BF01973637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. He Q., Mertsola J., Himanen J. P., Ruuskanen O., Viljanen M. K. Evaluation of pooled and individual components of Bordetella pertussis as antigens in an enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of pertussis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Sep;12(9):690–695. doi: 10.1007/BF02009381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. He Q., Viljanen M. K., Nikkari S., Lyytikäinen R., Mertsola J. Outcomes of Bordetella pertussis infection in different age groups of an immunized population. J Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;170(4):873–877. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.4.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Houard S., Hackel C., Herzog A., Bollen A. Specific identification of Bordetella pertussis by the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989 Sep;140(7):477–487. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Long S. S., Lischner H. W., Deforest A., Clark J. L. Serologic evidence of subclinical pertussis in immunized children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990 Oct;9(10):700–705. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199010000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meade B. D., Bollen A. Recommendations for use of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infections. J Med Microbiol. 1994 Jul;41(1):51–55. doi: 10.1099/00222615-41-1-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mertsola J., Ruuskanen O., Eerola E., Viljanen M. K. Intrafamilial spread of pertussis. J Pediatr. 1983 Sep;103(3):359–363. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80403-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Onorato I. M., Wassilak S. G. Laboratory diagnosis of pertussis: the state of the art. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Feb;6(2):145–151. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198702000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmitt-Grohé S., Cherry J. D., Heininger U., Uberall M. A., Pineda E., Stehr K. Pertussis in German adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Oct;21(4):860–866. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.4.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Zee A., Agterberg C., Peeters M., Mooi F., Schellekens J. A clinical validation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis polymerase chain reaction: comparison with culture and serology using samples from patients with suspected whooping cough from a highly immunized population. J Infect Dis. 1996 Jul;174(1):89–96. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES