Abstract
Methane production from waste of cattle fed a finishing diet was investigated, using four 3-liter-working volume anaerobic digestors at 60 degrees C. At 55 degrees C a start-up culture, in which waste was the only source of bacteria, was generated within 8 days and readily adapted to 60 degrees C, where efficiency of methanogenesis was greater. Increasing the temperature from 60 to 65 degrees C tended to drastically lower efficiency. When feed concentrations of volatile solids (VS, organic matter) were increased in steps of 2% after holding for 1 months at a given concentration, the maximum concentrations for efficient fermentation were 8.2, 10.0, 11.6, and 11.6% for the retention times (RT) of 3, 6, 9, and 12 days, respectively. The VS destructions for these and lower feed concentrations were 31 to 37, 36 to 40, 47 to 49 and 51 to 53% for the 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-day RT digestors, respectively, and the corresponding methane production rates were about 0.16, 0.18, 0.20, and 0.22 liters/day per g of VS in the feed. Gas contained 52 to 57% methane. At the above RT and feed concentrations, alkalinity rose to 5,000 to 7,700 mg of CaCo3 per liter (pH to 7.5 to 7.8), NH3 plus NH4+ to 64 to 90 mM, and total volatile acids to 850 to 2,050 mg/liter as acetate. The 3-day RT digestor was quite stable up to 8.2% feed VS and at this feed concentration produced methane at the very high rate of 4.5 liters/day per liter of digestor. Increasing the percentage of feed VS beyond those values indicated above resulted in greatly decreased organic matter destruction and methane production, variable decrease in pH, and increased alkalinity, ammonia, and total volatile acid concentrations, with propionate being the first to accumulate in large amounts. In a second experiment with another lot of waste, the results were similar. These studies indicate that loading rates can be much higher than those previously thought useful for maximizing methanogenesis from cattle waste.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bryant M. P., Robinson I. M. Some Nutritional Requirements of the Genus Ruminococcus. Appl Microbiol. 1961 Mar;9(2):91–95. doi: 10.1128/am.9.2.91-95.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHANEY A. L., MARBACH E. P. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem. 1962 Apr;8:130–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooney C. L. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of solid waste for fuel gas production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1975 Aug;17(8):1119–1135. doi: 10.1002/bit.260170804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphrey A. E. Economical factors in the assessment of various cellulosic substances as chemical and energy resources. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1975;(5):49–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iannotti E. L., Kafkewitz D., Wolin M. J., Bryant M. P. Glucose fermentation products in Ruminococcus albus grown in continuous culture with Vibrio succinogenes: changes caused by interspecies transfer of H 2 . J Bacteriol. 1973 Jun;114(3):1231–1240. doi: 10.1128/jb.114.3.1231-1240.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson R. E., Robbins F., Schilke R., Molé P., Harris J., Wakat D. A versatile system for measuring oxygen consumption in man. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Feb;22(2):377–379. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.2.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolin E. A., Wolfe R. S., Wolin M. J. Viologen dye inhibition of methane formation by Methanobacillus omelianskii. J Bacteriol. 1964 May;87(5):993–998. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.5.993-998.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]