Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1988 Mar;38(308):102–105.

Childhood cancer survivors and their offspring studied throught a postal survey of general practitioners: preliminary results

Michael M Hawkins, Rupert A Smith, Lisa J Curtice
PMCID: PMC1711229  PMID: 3204576

Abstract

A postal survey is being carried out among the general practitioners of survivors of childhood cancer born before 1963 and treated in Britain. The response rate is currently about 88%. Based on a preliminary analysis of 2001 questionnaires it emerged that fewer childhood cancer survivors married than was expected from the general population. The number of live births to female survivors was 57% of that expected from general population rates. The frequency of congenital malformations among the offspring was not in excess of that expected on the basis of large population based surveillance rates and the number of malignant tumours observed was broadly similar to that expected from general population rates, although the results were based on very small numbers. The present data, taken together with other studies of the offspring of cancer survivors, provides grounds for optimism with regard to the inherited component of childhood cancer and the effects of radiotherapy and cytotoxic drugs on germ cell mutation.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cartwright A. Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-77. Br Med J. 1978 Nov 18;2(6149):1419–1421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cartwright A., Ward A. W. Variations in general practitioners' response to postal questionnaires. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1968 Oct;22(4):199–205. doi: 10.1136/jech.22.4.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawes K. S. Survey of general practice records. Br Med J. 1972 Jul 22;3(5820):219–223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5820.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mulvihill J. J., Myers M. H., Connelly R. R., Byrne J., Austin D. F., Bragg K., Cook J. W., Hassinger D. D., Holmes F. F., Holmes G. F. Cancer in offspring of long-term survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. Lancet. 1987 Oct 10;2(8563):813–817. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rustin G. J., Booth M., Dent J., Salt S., Rustin F., Bagshawe K. D. Pregnancy after cytotoxic chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic tumours. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jan 14;288(6411):103–106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6411.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schull W. J., Otake M., Neel J. V. Genetic effects of the atomic bombs: a reappraisal. Science. 1981 Sep 11;213(4513):1220–1227. doi: 10.1126/science.7268429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Senturia Y. D., Peckham C. S., Peckham M. J. Children fathered by men treated for testicular cancer. Lancet. 1985 Oct 5;2(8458):766–769. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90640-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES