Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1988 May;38(310):207–211.

The organization of cervical screening in general practice

Christine Havelock, Robert Edwards, Jack Cuzick, Jocelyn Chamberlain
PMCID: PMC1711433  PMID: 3210183

Abstract

Well organized cervical screening in general practice can have considerable clinical and financial rewards. Yet in a randomized survey of general practitioners in the United Kingdom only 43% operated a system for cervical screening which allows previously untested women to be identified and invited for testing.

A younger age of general practitioner, a more rural practice, a larger practice size, employment of a practice nurse, a belief in the effectiveness of cervical screening and a positive view of the time spent on screening were all strong predictors of an organized approach to cervical screening within a practice. Being female or having a female partner was not statistically associated with systematic screening. The results demonstrate a need for education within general practice which emphasizes the relevance and significance of cervical screening and the essential contribution that can be made by each individual general practitioner to the success of the whole cervical screening programme.

Full text

PDF
207

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beilby J. O., Bourne R., Guillebaud J., Steele S. T. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jul;60(1):46–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berget A. Influence of population screening on morbidity and mortality of cancer of the uterine cervix in Maribo Amt. Dan Med Bull. 1979 Apr;26(2):91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johannesson G., Geirsson G., Day N., Tulinius H. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Iceland 1965--1978. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(3):199–203. doi: 10.3109/00016348209156556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Macgregor J. E., Moss S. M., Parkin D. M., Day N. E. A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 25;290(6481):1543–1546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6481.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parkin D. M., Collins W., Clayden A. D. Cervical cytology screening in two Yorkshire areas: pattern of service. Public Health. 1981 Nov;95(6):311–321. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(81)80003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pettersson F., Björkholm E., Näslund I. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Dec;14(4):521–527. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.4.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Standing P., Mercer S. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):883–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES