Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1988 Jul;38(312):307–310.

General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work?

JL Reynolds, PL Yudkin, MJV Bull
PMCID: PMC1711490  PMID: 3255826

Abstract

The effectiveness of antenatal risk prediction based on maternal characteristics at booking was examined among 5730 pregnant women booked in an integrated general practitioner obstetric unit over a seven-year period. High rates of transfer to consultant care were found especially for nulliparae. Apart from parity, maternal factors associated with transfer before labour were weight, smoking and social class. Factors associated with transfer in labour were maternal stature and marital status. Reasons for transfer were also identified. The validity of the present booking criteria, which were developed in the 1950s, is questioned.

Full text

PDF
307

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black N. Do general practitioner deliveries constitute a perinatal mortality risk? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Feb 13;284(6314):488–490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6314.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull M. J. Ten years' experience in a general practice obstetric unit. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Apr;30(213):208–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bull M. J. The general practitioner accoucheur in the 1980s. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jun;31(227):357–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper J. A. Obstetric care in the first pregnancy. Br J Clin Pract. 1969 Mar;23(3):107–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geals M. F., Howat R. C. Perinatal mortality in pregnancies booked for a general practitioner maternity unit. Health Bull (Edinb) 1977 Sep;35(5):248–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):118–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klein M., Lloyd I., Redman C., Bull M., Turnbull A. C. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):123–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marsh G. N., Cashman H. A., Russell I. T. General practitioner obstetrics in the Northern region in 1983. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Mar 23;290(6472):901–903. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6472.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Richmond G. A. An analysis of 3,199 patients booked for delivery in general-practitioner obstetric units. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jul;27(180):406–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor G. W., Edgar W., Taylor B. A., Neal D. G. How safe is general practitioner obstetrics? Lancet. 1980 Dec 13;2(8207):1287–1289. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92348-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yudkin P. L., Redman C. W. Caesarean section dissected, 1978-1983. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Feb;93(2):135–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES