Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1989 Feb;39(319):45–48.

Symphysis-fundus measurements in screening for small-for-dates infants: a community based study in Gloucestershire.

J M Stuart, T J Healy, M Sutton, G R Swingler
PMCID: PMC1711768  PMID: 2552089

Abstract

Symphysis-fundus charts were introduced into 50 general practitioner antenatal clinics and the hospital antenatal clinics of two obstetricians in Gloucestershire in February 1985 for a 12-month period. Of the 1139 charts analysed, the sensitivity of one or more low fundal height measurements in predicting birthweight below the tenth centile for gestational age was 51% with a specificity of 88%. In the 319 charts with four or more measurements after 26 weeks gestation a sensitivity of 65% was recorded in predicting birthweight below the tenth centile, rising to 91% in the prediction of birthweight below the fifth centile; the specificity was correspondingly 81% and 80%. The sensitivity of the test varied inversely with maternal body mass index. The mean absolute difference in pairs of observations between general practitioners, midwives and an observer was 1.5 cm. Measurement of symphysis-fundus distance is not a precise diagnostic tool but it does provide an improvement on abdominal palpation in the prediction of small-for-dates infants. The findings of this study support the use of serial symphysis-fundus measurements in community antenatal clinics. Referral for ultrasound investigation is recommended when the measurement is low.

Full text

PDF
45

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Babson S. G. Growth of low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr. 1970 Jul;77(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(70)80039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belizán J. M., Villar J., Nardin J. C., Malamud J., De Vicurna L. S. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul 15;131(6):643–646. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90824-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calvert J. P., Crean E. E., Newcombe R. G., Pearson J. F. Antenatal screening by measurement of symphysis-fundus height. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Sep 25;285(6345):846–849. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6345.846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiswick M. L. Intrauterine growth retardation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Sep 28;291(6499):845–848. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cnattingius S., Axelsson O., Lindmark G. Symphysis-fundus measurements and intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(4):335–340. doi: 10.3109/00016348409155527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dobson P. C., Abell D. A., Beischer N. A. Mortality and morbidity of fetal growth retardation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 May;21(2):69–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1981.tb00781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gairdner D., Pearson J. A growth chart for premature and other infants. Arch Dis Child. 1971 Dec;46(250):783–787. doi: 10.1136/adc.46.250.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall M. H., Chng P. K., MacGillivray I. Is routine antenatal care worth while? Lancet. 1980 Jul 12;2(8185):78–80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92950-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hepburn M., Rosenberg K. An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;93(3):212–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Low J. A., Galbraith R. S. Pregnancy characteristics of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Jul;44(1):122–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pearce J. M., Campbell S. A comparison of symphysis-fundal height and ultrasound as screening tests for light-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Feb;94(2):100–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Persson B., Stangenberg M., Lunell N. O., Brodin U., Holmberg N. G., Vaclavinkova V. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;93(3):206–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quaranta P., Currell R., Redman C. W., Robinson J. S. Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysial-fundal-height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Feb;88(2):115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenberg K., Grant J. M., Hepburn M. Antenatal detection of growth retardation: actual practice in a large maternity hospital. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jan;89(1):12–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenberg K., Grant J. M., Tweedie I., Aitchison T., Gallagher F. Measurement of fundal height as a screening test for fetal growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jun;89(6):447–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomson A. M., Billewicz W. Z., Hytten F. E. The assessment of fetal growth. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968 Sep;75(9):903–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968.tb01615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Westin B. Gravidogram and fetal growth. Comparison with biochemical supervision. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56(4):273–282. doi: 10.3109/00016347709154978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES