Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1989 Jun;39(323):244–246.

Randomized controlled trial of an educational booklet for patients presenting with back pain in general practice.

M Roland, M Dixon
PMCID: PMC1711929  PMID: 2556518

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate an educational booklet on back pain for patients presenting to five group practices during one calendar year. The booklet had no immediate effect on consultations for back pain, but in the period from two weeks to one year after presentation significantly fewer patients in the group receiving the booklet consulted with back pain (35.6%) than in the control group (42.2%) (P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences between the booklet and control groups in certified absence from work owing to back pain. Referral to hospital, referral to physiotherapy, admissions to hospital and laminectomies were all less common in the booklet group. The reduction in the combined referral rate to physiotherapy and hospital, and the reduction in laminectomy rate almost reached statistical significance at the 5% level. In replying to a questionnaire sent one year after entry to the study 94.1% of respondents in the booklet group said that they had read the book, 84.0% said that they found it useful, and 68.0% said that they still had a copy. Scores on a 15-item test of knowledge about back pain were significantly higher in the group of patients who had received the booklet than in the control group. The results suggest that the booklet had some effect in altering both the knowledge and behaviour of patients with back pain. The provision of an educational booklet was a method of giving information which was appreciated by both patients and doctors.

Full text

PDF
244

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. E., Morrell D. C., Avery A. J., Watkins C. J. Evaluation of a patient education manual. Br Med J. 1980 Oct 4;281(6245):924–926. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6245.924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergquist-Ullman M., Larsson U. Acute low back pain in industry. A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;(170):1–117. doi: 10.3109/ort.1977.48.suppl-170.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klaber Moffett J. A., Chase S. M., Portek I., Ennis J. R. A controlled, prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986 Mar;11(2):120–122. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198603000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Russell M. A., Wilson C., Taylor C., Baker C. D. Effect of general practitioners' advice against smoking. Br Med J. 1979 Jul 28;2(6184):231–235. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6184.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Watkins C. J., Papacosta A. O., Chinn S., Martin J. A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Dec;37(305):548–550. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES