Abstract
A questionnaire was sent to those practices known by the Royal College of General Practitioners to have produced annual reports. Practices were asked what data they included, to whom the report was circulated, what problems and benefits they encountered, and their opinion of the government's proposal to encourage such reports. The data most frequently included in reports related to practice workload, and the main benefit which respondents mentioned was facilitation of planning within the practice. Few practices used data derived from outside the practice and several commented on the difficulty of obtaining good quality data from the practice. Although annual reports are useful as internal documents, standardization of definitions and format, with support from family practitioner committees and health authorities is essential if more practices are to be encouraged to produce such documents and if the information obtained from them is to have a broader role in planning for primary health care.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Jarman B., Bosanquet N., Rice P., Dollimore N., Leese B. Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 25;296(6639):1775–1778. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6639.1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGuinness B. W. Why not a practice annual report? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Dec;30(221):744–744. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore A. T., Roland M. O. How much variation in referral rates among general practitioners is due to chance? BMJ. 1989 Feb 25;298(6672):500–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6672.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]