Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1997 Sep;61(3):660–667. doi: 10.1086/515496

Screening and diagnosis for the fragile X syndrome among the mentally retarded: an epidemiological and psychological survey. Collaborative Fragile X Study Group.

B B de Vries 1, A M van den Ouweland 1, S Mohkamsing 1, H J Duivenvoorden 1, E Mol 1, K Gelsema 1, M van Rijn 1, D J Halley 1, L A Sandkuijl 1, B A Oostra 1, A Tibben 1, M F Niermeijer 1
PMCID: PMC1715962  PMID: 9326332

Abstract

The fragile X syndrome is an X-linked mental retardation disorder caused by an expanded CGG repeat in the first exon of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene. Its frequency, X-linked inheritance, and consequences for relatives all prompt for diagnosis of this disorder on a large scale in all affected individuals. A screening for the fragile X syndrome has been conducted in a representative sample of 3,352 individuals in schools and institutes for the mentally retarded in the southwestern Netherlands, by use of a brief physical examination and the DNA test. The attitudes and reactions of (non)consenting parents/guardians were studied by (pre- and posttest) questionnaires. A total of 2,189 individuals (65%) were eligible for testing, since they had no valid diagnosis, cerebral palsy, or a previous test for the FMR1 gene mutation. Seventy percent (1,531/2,189) of the parents/guardians consented to testing. Besides 32 previously diagnosed fragile X patients, 11 new patients (9 males and 2 females) were diagnosed. Scoring of physical features was effective in preselection, especially for males (sensitivity .91 and specificity .92). Major motives to participate in the screening were the wish to obtain a diagnosis (82%), the hereditary implications (80%), and the support of research into mental retardation (81%). Thirty-four percent of the parents/guardians will seek additional diagnostic workup after exclusion of the fragile X syndrome. The prevalence of the fragile X syndrome was estimated at 1/ 6,045 for males (95% confidence interval 1/9,981-1/ 3,851). On the basis of the actual number of diagnosed cases in the Netherlands, it is estimated that >50% of the fragile X cases are undiagnosed at present.

Full text

PDF
660

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonthron D., Strain L. Population screening for fragile-X syndrome. Lancet. 1993 Mar 20;341(8847):769–770. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90552-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bundey S., Norman E. Population screening for fragile-X syndrome. Lancet. 1993 Mar 20;341(8847):770–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craft N. Study supports screening for the fragile X syndrome. BMJ. 1995 Jan 21;310(6973):148–148. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.148a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu Y. H., Kuhl D. P., Pizzuti A., Pieretti M., Sutcliffe J. S., Richards S., Verkerk A. J., Holden J. J., Fenwick R. G., Jr, Warren S. T. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagerman R. J., Wilson P., Staley L. W., Lang K. A., Fan T., Uhlhorn C., Jewell-Smart S., Hull C., Drisko J., Flom K. Evaluation of school children at high risk for fragile X syndrome utilizing buccal cell FMR-1 testing. Am J Med Genet. 1994 Jul 15;51(4):474–481. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320510436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howard-Peebles P. N., Maddalena A., Black S. H., Schulman J. D. Population screening for fragile-X syndrome. Lancet. 1993 Mar 20;341(8847):770–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobs P. A., Bullman H., Macpherson J., Youings S., Rooney V., Watson A., Dennis N. R. Population studies of the fragile X: a molecular approach. J Med Genet. 1993 Jun;30(6):454–459. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.6.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laing S., Partington M., Robinson H., Turner G. Clinical screening score for the fragile X (Martin-Bell) syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1991 Feb-Mar;38(2-3):256–259. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320380219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laxova R. Fragile X screening: what is the real issue? Am J Med Genet. 1995 Jul 3;57(3):508–509. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320570335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller S. A., Dykes D. D., Polesky H. F. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1215–1215. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray A., Youings S., Dennis N., Latsky L., Linehan P., McKechnie N., Macpherson J., Pound M., Jacobs P. Population screening at the FRAXA and FRAXE loci: molecular analyses of boys with learning difficulties and their mothers. Hum Mol Genet. 1996 Jun;5(6):727–735. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.6.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oberlé I., Rousseau F., Heitz D., Kretz C., Devys D., Hanauer A., Boué J., Bertheas M. F., Mandel J. L. Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1097–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oostra B. A., Jacky P. B., Brown W. T., Rousseau F. Guidelines for the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. National Fragile X Foundation. J Med Genet. 1993 May;30(5):410–413. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.5.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palomaki G. E., Haddow J. E. Is it time for population-based prenatal screening for fragile-X? Lancet. 1993 Feb 6;341(8841):373–374. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90176-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pieretti M., Zhang F. P., Fu Y. H., Warren S. T., Oostra B. A., Caskey C. T., Nelson D. L. Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome. Cell. 1991 Aug 23;66(4):817–822. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90125-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rousseau F., Rouillard P., Morel M. L., Khandjian E. W., Morgan K. Prevalence of carriers of premutation-size alleles of the FMRI gene--and implications for the population genetics of the fragile X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Nov;57(5):1006–1018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Slaney S. F., Wilkie A. O., Hirst M. C., Charlton R., McKinley M., Pointon J., Christodoulou Z., Huson S. M., Davies K. E. DNA testing for fragile X syndrome in schools for learning difficulties. Arch Dis Child. 1995 Jan;72(1):33–37. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steele J., Stratford B. The United Kingdom population with Down syndrome: present and future projections. Am J Ment Retard. 1995 May;99(6):664–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sutcliffe J. S., Nelson D. L., Zhang F., Pieretti M., Caskey C. T., Saxe D., Warren S. T. DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1992 Sep;1(6):397–400. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.6.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Turner G., Robinson H., Laing S., Purvis-Smith S. Preventive screening for the fragile X syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):607–609. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Turner G., Robinson H., Laing S., van den Berk M., Colley A., Goddard A., Sherman S., Partington M. Population screening for fragile X. Lancet. 1992 May 16;339(8803):1210–1213. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91142-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turner G., Webb T., Wake S., Robinson H. Prevalence of fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1996 Jul 12;64(1):196–197. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960712)64:1<196::AID-AJMG35>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Verheij C., Bakker C. E., de Graaff E., Keulemans J., Willemsen R., Verkerk A. J., Galjaard H., Reuser A. J., Hoogeveen A. T., Oostra B. A. Characterization and localization of the FMR-1 gene product associated with fragile X syndrome. Nature. 1993 Jun 24;363(6431):722–724. doi: 10.1038/363722a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Webb T. P., Bundey S. E., Thake A. I., Todd J. Population incidence and segregation ratios in the Martin-Bell syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1986 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):573–580. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320230151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Willemsen R., Mohkamsing S., de Vries B., Devys D., van den Ouweland A., Mandel J. L., Galjaard H., Oostra B. Rapid antibody test for fragile X syndrome. Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1147–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90979-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu S., Pritchard M., Kremer E., Lynch M., Nancarrow J., Baker E., Holman K., Mulley J. C., Warren S. T., Schlessinger D. Fragile X genotype characterized by an unstable region of DNA. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1179–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van den Ouweland A. M., de Vries B. B., Bakker P. L., Deelen W. H., de Graaff E., van Hemel J. O., Oostra B. A., Niermeijer M. F., Halley D. J. DNA diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome in a series of 236 mentally retarded subjects and evidence for a reversal of mutation in the FMR-1 gene. Am J Med Genet. 1994 Jul 15;51(4):482–485. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320510437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES