Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1998 Mar;78(3):217–221. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.3.217

Procedures, placement, and risks of further abuse after Munchausen syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation

P Davis 1, R McClure 1, K Rolfe 1, N Chessman 1, S Pearson 1, J Sibert 1, R Meadow 1
PMCID: PMC1717484  PMID: 9613350

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To investigate outcome, management, and prevention in Munchausen syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation.
DESIGN—Ascertainment through British Paediatric Surveillance Unit and questionnaires to responding paediatricians.
SETTING—The UK and Republic of Ireland, September 1992 to August 1994.
SUBJECTS—Children under 14 years diagnosed with the above.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Placement and child protection measures for victims and siblings; morbidity and reabuse rates for victims; abuse of siblings; prosecution of perpetrators.
RESULTS—Outcome data for 119 with median follow up of 24 months (range 12 to 44 months). No previously diagnosed factitious disease was found to have been caused by genuine disease. Forty six children were allowed home without conditions at follow up. Children who had suffered from suffocation, non-accidental poisoning, direct harm, and those under 5 years were less likely to go home.
 Twenty seven (24%) children still had symptoms or signs as a result of the abuse at follow up; 108/120 were originally on a child protection register and 35/111 at follow up. Twenty nine per cent (34/118) of the perpetrators had been prosecuted and most convicted; 17% of the milder cases of Munchausen syndrome by proxy allowed home were reabused. Evidence in siblings suggests that in 50% of families with a suffocated child and 40% with non-accidental poisoning there would be further abuse, some fatal.
CONCLUSIONS—This type of abuse is severe with high mortality, morbidity, family disruption, reabuse, and harm to siblings. A very cautious approach for child protection with reintroduction to home only if circumstances are especially favourable is advised. Paediatric follow up by an expert in child protection should also occur.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bools C. N., Neale B. A., Meadow S. R. Follow up of victims of fabricated illness (Munchausen syndrome by proxy). Arch Dis Child. 1993 Dec;69(6):625–630. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.6.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McClure R. J., Davis P. M., Meadow S. R., Sibert J. R. Epidemiology of Munchausen syndrome by proxy, non-accidental poisoning, and non-accidental suffocation. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Jul;75(1):57–61. doi: 10.1136/adc.75.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McGuire T. L., Feldman K. W. Psychologic morbidity of children subjected to Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Pediatrics. 1989 Feb;83(2):289–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meadow R. Management of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child. 1985 Apr;60(4):385–393. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.4.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Samuels M. P., Southall D. P. Munchausen syndrome by proxy. 1992 May 20-Jun 2Br J Hosp Med. 47(10):759–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES