Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1998 Sep;79(3):213–218. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.3.213

Parental and professional perception of need for emergency admission to hospital: prospective questionnaire based study

R MacFaul 1, M Stewart 1, U Werneke 1, J Taylor-Meek 1, H Smith 1, I Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1717678  PMID: 9875015

Abstract

AIM—To compare views of parents, consultants, and general practitioners on severity of acute illness and need for admission, and to explore views on alternative services.
METHOD—Prospective questionnaire based study of 887 consecutive emergency paediatric admissions over two separate three week periods in summer and winter of five Yorkshire hospitals, combined with a further questionnaire on a subsample.
OUTCOME MEASURES—Parental scores of need for admission and parent and consultant illness severity scores out of 10. Consultant judgment of need for admission. Alternatives to admission considered by consultants and, for a subsample, by parents and family GP.
RESULTS—Ninety nine per cent of parents thought admission was needed. Parents scored need for admission more highly than severity of illness with no association observed between severity and presenting problem or diagnosis. High parental need score was associated with a fit, past illness, and length of stay. Consultant illness severity scores were skewed to the lower range. Consultants considered admission necessary in 71%, especially for children aged over 1 year, presentation with breathing difficulty or fit, and after a longer stay. More admissions in the evening were considered unnecessary as were admissions after longer preadmission illness, gastroenteritis, or upper respiratory tract infection. Of a subsample of parents, 81% preferred admission during the acute stage of illness even if home nursing had been available. Similar responses were obtained from GPs. Alternative services could have avoided admission for 19% of children, saving 15.6% of bed days used.
CONCLUSIONS—Medical professionals and parents differ in their views about admission for acute illnesses. More information is needed on children not admitted. Alternative services should take account of patterns of illness and should be acceptable to parents and professionals; cost savings may be marginal.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumer J. H., David T. J., Valentine S. J., Roberts J. E., Hughes B. R. Many parents think their child is dying when having a first febrile convulsion. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1981 Aug;23(4):462–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1981.tb02019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beverley D. W., Ball R. J., Smith R. A., Harran M. J., Durrans G. M., Keenan S., Smith J., Durack B. Planning for the future: the experience of implementing a children's day assessment unit in a district general hospital. Arch Dis Child. 1997 Oct;77(4):287–293. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.4.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Browne G. J., Penna A. Short stay facilities: the future of efficient paediatric emergency services. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Apr;74(4):309–313. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.4.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haslum M. N. Length of preschool hospitalization, multiple admissions and later educational attainment and behaviour. Child Care Health Dev. 1988 Jul-Aug;14(4):275–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1988.tb00581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kai J. What worries parents when their preschool children are acutely ill, and why: a qualitative study. BMJ. 1996 Oct 19;313(7063):983–986. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McConnochie K. M., Roghmann K. J., Kitzman H. J., Liptak G. S., McBride J. T. Ensuring high-quality alternatives while ending pediatric inpatient care as we know it. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Apr;151(4):341–349. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170410015002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meates M. Ambulatory paediatrics--making a difference. Arch Dis Child. 1997 May;76(5):468–476. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.5.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Meates M. Ambulatory paediatrics--making a difference. Arch Dis Child. 1997 May;76(5):468–476. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.5.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Prince M., Worth C. A study of 'inappropriate' attendances to a paediatric Accident and Emergency Department. J Public Health Med. 1992 Jun;14(2):177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roberts H. Listen to the parents. BMJ. 1996 Oct 19;313(7063):954–955. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7063.954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Werneke U., Smith H., Smith I. J., Taylor J., MacFaul R. Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice. Arch Dis Child. 1997 Oct;77(4):294–298. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.4.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES