Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1999 Jan;80(1):21–27. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.1.21

Evaluation of a national surveillance unit

M Gazarian 1, K Williams 1, E Elliott 1, K Chant 1, H Longbottom 1, C Mellis 1, T Nolan 1, R Oates 1, A Ruben 1
PMCID: PMC1717810  PMID: 10325754

Abstract

AIM—The Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit (APSU) facilitates national active surveillance of uncommon childhood conditions. This study assessed whether it fulfilled its objectives and satisfied criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for evaluating surveillance systems.
METHODS—Anonymous questionnaires were sent to users of the system, individual studies were reviewed, and data were collected from independent sources.
RESULTS—Seven hundred and sixty six clinicians, 48 investigators, and 15 public health professionals responded to the questionnaires. Clinicians reported that the APSU was useful, 33% saying information provided by the APSU informed or changed their clinical practice. Most (88%) reported that completing monthly report cards was not a burden. Impact on policy development was limited by suboptimal dissemination of information to public health professionals. Flexibility and timeliness were limited by design. Estimated sensitivity of APSU studies ranged from 92% (congenital rubella) to 31% (drowning/near drowning). Positive predictive value of notified cases was over 70% for most studies.
CONCLUSION—The APSU fulfils most of its objectives and meets CDC criteria salient to these. Ways in which the APSU could be improved have been identified, as have methodological challenges and limitations in applying CDC guidelines to this type of unit.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alperstein G., Vimpani G. V. Reducing the lead load in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health. 1994 Feb;30(1):3–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1994.tb00554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Booy R., Heath P. T., Slack M. P., Begg N., Moxon E. R. Vaccine failures after primary immunisation with Haemophilus influenzae type-b conjugate vaccine without booster. Lancet. 1997 Apr 26;349(9060):1197–1202. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)06392-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forrest J. M., Burgess M. A. Plotting the demise of congenital rubella and varicella. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1996 Feb;20(1):4–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1996.tb01322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Godward S., Dezateux C. Validation of the reporting bases of the orthopaedic and paediatric surveillance schemes. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Sep;75(3):232–236. doi: 10.1136/adc.75.3.232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall S. M., Glickman M. The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Mar;63(3):344–346. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.3.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinds M. W., Skaggs J. W., Bergeisen G. H. Benefit-cost analysis of active surveillance of primary care physicians for hepatitis A. Am J Public Health. 1985 Feb;75(2):176–177. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.2.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leonard H., Bower C., English D. The prevalence and incidence of Rett syndrome in Australia. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;6 (Suppl 1):8–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leonard H., Thomson M., Bower C., Fyfe S., Constantinou J. Skeletal abnormalities in Rett syndrome: increasing evidence for dysmorphogenetic defects. Am J Med Genet. 1995 Sep 11;58(3):282–285. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320580316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDonald A. M., Cruickshank M., Ziegler J. B., Elliott E., Kaldor J. M. Perinatal exposure to HIV in Australia, 1982-1994. Med J Aust. 1997 Jan 20;166(2):77–80. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138725.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Papoz L., Balkau B., Lellouch J. Case counting in epidemiology: limitations of methods based on multiple data sources. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;25(3):474–478. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.3.474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Royle J. A., Williams K., Elliott E., Sholler G., Nolan T., Allen R., Isaacs D. Kawasaki disease in Australia, 1993-95. Arch Dis Child. 1998 Jan;78(1):33–39. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thacker S. B., Parrish R. G., Trowbridge F. L. A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance. World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(1):11–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vogt R. L., LaRue D., Klaucke D. N., Jillson D. A. Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jul;73(7):795–797. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wadsworth E., Shield J., Hunt L., Baum D. Insulin dependent diabetes in children under 5: incidence and ascertainment validation for 1992. BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):700–703. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES