Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1999 Aug;81(2):172–173. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.2.172

Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods

R Bull 1, P Edwards 1, P Kemp 1, S Fry 1, I Hughes 1
PMCID: PMC1718009  PMID: 10490531

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. King D. G., Steventon D. M., O'Sullivan M. P., Cook A. M., Hornsby V. P., Jefferson I. G., King P. R. Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods. Br J Radiol. 1994 Sep;67(801):848–851. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-801-848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Milner G. R., Levick R. K., Kay R. Assessment of bone age: a comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and the Tanner and Whitehouse methods. Clin Radiol. 1986 Mar;37(2):119–121. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(86)80376-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES