Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1999 Oct;81(4):309–312. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.4.309

Dual pH probe monitoring versus single pH probe monitoring in infants on milk feeds: the impact on diagnosis

N Washington 1, P Spensley 1, C Smith 1, M Parker 1, D Bush 1, S Jackson 1, L Kapila 1, T Stephenson 1, C Washington 1
PMCID: PMC1718105  PMID: 10490434

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Oesophageal pH monitoring is the gold standard technique for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in adults and children. A standard parameter used to define "abnormal" reflux is the percentage of recording time for which the gastric pH is < 4. This study investigated the relevance of this measure in infants on regular milk feeds whose gastric contents and refluxate will be neutral for most of the recording time.
METHODS—Simultaneous oesophageal and gastric pH monitoring was carried out on all infants who were milk fed exclusively and admitted to hospital for suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux. In vitro studies were performed to establish the buffering capacities of the fruit juice, Dioralyte (a glucose electrolyte solution), breast milk, and milk formula feeds available on the paediatric wards.
RESULTS—Complete sets of data were obtained from 30 babies with a mean age of 4 months. Gastric pH was ⩽ 4 for a mean (SEM) of 42.4(4.9)% of the recording time. The mean (SEM) percentage time that oesophageal pH was < 4 for the total recording period was 6.89(0.92)%. Recalculation of the percentage of time that the gastric pH was > 4 increased this value to 17.81 (2.46)%. Using a cut off point of 10%, 11 of the 30 babies would have been diagnosed positive for reflux using the conventional method; however, recalculation by ignoring the time for which gastric pH was high doubled this to 22 positive for reflux.
CONCLUSION—Combined oesophageal and gastric pH monitoring greatly increases the number of positive results from tests in infants on regular milk feeds.


Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Di Lorenzo C., Piepsz A., Ham H., Cadranel S. Gastric emptying with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Arch Dis Child. 1987 May;62(5):449–453. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.5.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans D. F., Haynes J., Jones J. A., Stower M. J., Kapila L. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in children as an indicator for surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 1986 Mar;21(3):221–223. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80838-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gomes H., Lallemand P. Infant apnea and gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22(1):8–11. doi: 10.1007/BF02011601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guillet J., Wynchank S., Christophe E., Basse-Cathalinat B., Ducassou D., Blanquet P. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric emptying of liquids in paediatric patients. Int J Nucl Med Biol. 1984;11(3-4):254–258. doi: 10.1016/0047-0740(84)90008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sutphen J. L., Dillard V. L. Dietary caloric density and osmolality influence gastroesophageal reflux in infants. Gastroenterology. 1989 Sep;97(3):601–604. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90630-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vandenplas Y., Franckx-Goossens A., Pipeleers-Marichal M., Derde M. P., Sacré-Smits L. Area under pH 4: advantages of a new parameter in the interpretation of esophageal pH monitoring data in infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989 Jul;9(1):34–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Varty K., Evans D., Kapila L. Paediatric gastro-oesophageal reflux: prognostic indicators from pH monitoring. Gut. 1993 Nov;34(11):1478–1481. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.11.1478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES