Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2001 Mar;84(3):270–272. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.3.270

Parental compliance with home cardiorespiratory monitoring

T Carbone 1, B Ostfeld 1, D Gutter 1, T Hegyi 1
PMCID: PMC1718681  PMID: 11207183

Abstract

AIMS—To evaluate parental compliance with home cardiorespiratory monitoring of premature infants with apnoea, siblings of infants who died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and infants with an apparent life threatening event (ALTE), during the first month of use.
METHODS—A retrospective review of the first month's recordings was conducted on 39 premature infants with apnoea, 13 siblings of SIDS, and 16 infants with ALTE. All infants were singletons. Recommendations during the study period (1992-1994) were for daily use for 23hours per day. Measurements were average daily hours of use and consistency of use (daily or variable). Gestational age, maternal age, and socioeconomic status as measured by receipt of public assistance were also recorded.
RESULTS—Siblings of SIDS were monitored for fewer hours than were premature or ALTE infants. Only 54% of sibings of SIDS were monitored daily, compared to 87% of premature infants and 93% of ALTEs. Within each diagnostic category socioeconomic status did not affect average hours of monitoring. Consistency of use was more evident in those with private insurance, although the trend did not reach significance.
CONCLUSIONS—Parents of infants with apnoea of prematurity or ALTE are highly compliant with cardiorespiratory monitoring recommendations in the first month of monitor usage. Siblings of SIDS are monitored for fewer hours and are less likely to be monitored on a daily basis.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cordero L., Morehead S., Miller R. Parental compliance with home apnea monitoring. J Perinatol. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):448–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Côté A., Hum C., Brouillette R. T., Themens M. Frequency and timing of recurrent events in infants using home cardiorespiratory monitors. J Pediatr. 1998 May;132(5):783–789. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70304-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoffman H. J., Hillman L. S. Epidemiology of the sudden infant death syndrome: maternal, neonatal, and postneonatal risk factors. Clin Perinatol. 1992 Dec;19(4):717–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohan C. G., Baird T. M., Super D. M., Chan A. K., Moore J. J. Weekly telephone contact does not enhance the compliance of home apnea monitoring. J Perinatol. 1999 Oct-Nov;19(7):505–509. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Silvestri J. M., Hufford D. R., Jr, Durham J., Pearsall S. M., Oess M. A., Weese-Mayer D. E., Hunt C. E., Levenson S. M., Corwin M. J. Assessment of compliance with home cardiorespiratory monitoring in infants at risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation (CHIME). J Pediatr. 1995 Sep;127(3):384–388. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES