Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2001 Aug;85(2):155–157. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.2.155

Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable

A Roessingh 1, A Drukker 1, J Guignard 1
PMCID: PMC1718890  PMID: 11466191

Abstract

AIM—To evaluate the reliability of dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity (U-SG).
METHODS—Fresh urine specimens were tested for urine pH and osmolality (U-pH, U-Osm) by a pH meter and an osmometer, and for U-SG by three different methods (refractometry, automatic readout of a dipstick (Clinitek-50), and (visual) change of colour of the dipstick).
RESULTS—The correlations between the visual U-SG dipstick measurements and U-SG determined by a refractometer and the comparison of Clinitek®-50 dipstick U-SG measurements with U-Osm were less than optimal, showing very wide scatter of values. Only the U-SG refractometer values and U-Osm had a good linear correlation. The tested dipstick was unreliable for the bedside determination of U-SG, even after correction for U-pH, as recommended by the manufacturer.
CONCLUSIONS—Among the bedside determinations, only refractometry gives reliable U-SG results. Dipstick U-SG measurements should be abandoned.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams L. J. Evaluation of ames Multistix-SG for urine specific gravity versus refractometer specific gravity. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Dec;80(6):871–873. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/80.6.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assadi F. K., Fornell L. Estimation of urine specific gravity in neonates with a reagent strip. J Pediatr. 1986 Jun;108(6):995–996. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80948-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton S. J., Holmes S. S. A comparison of reagent strips and the refractometer for measurement of urine specific gravity in hospitalized children. Pediatr Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;24(5):480–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dorizzi R. M., Caputo M. Measurement of urine relative density using refractometer and reagent strips. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998 Dec;36(12):925–928. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gouyon J. B., Houchan N. Assessment of urine specific gravity by reagent strip test in newborn infants. Pediatr Nephrol. 1993 Feb;7(1):77–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00861579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirschbaum B. B. Evaluation of a colorimetric reagent strip assay for urine specific gravity. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Jun;79(6):722–725. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.6.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leech S., Penney M. D. Correlation of specific gravity and osmolality of urine in neonates and adults. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Jul;62(7):671–673. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.7.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCrossin T., Roy L. P. Comparison of hydrometry, refractometry, osmometry and Ames N-Multistix SG in estimation of urinary concentration. Aust Paediatr J. 1985 Aug;21(3):185–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1985.tb02130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rumley A. Urine dipstick testing: comparison of results obtained by visual reading and with the Bayer CLINITEK 50. Ann Clin Biochem. 2000 Mar;37(Pt 2):220–221. doi: 10.1258/0004563001899041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Siegrist D., Hess B., Montandon M., Takkinen R., Lippuner K., Jaeger P. Spezifisches Gewicht des Urins--vergleichende Messungen mit Teststreifen und Refraktometer bei 340 Morgenurinproben. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1993 Jan 26;82(4):112–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES