Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2003 Oct;88(10):870–875. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.10.870

Development and evaluation of a follow up assessment of preterm infants at 5 years of age

M J K de Kleine 1, A L den Ouden 1, L Kollee 1, M W G N van der Sanden 1, M Sondaar 1, B J M van Kessel-Feddem 1, S Knuijt 1, A L van Baar 1, A Ilsen 1, R Breur-Pieterse 1, J Briet 1, R Brand 1, S Verloove-Vanhoric 1
PMCID: PMC1719302  PMID: 14500304

Abstract

Background: Long term follow up shows a high frequency of developmental disturbances in preterm survivors of neonatal intensive care formerly considered non-disabled.

Aims: To develop and validate an assessment tool that can help paediatricians to identify before 6 years of age which survivors have developmental disturbances that may interfere with normal education and normal life.

Methods: A total of 431 very premature infants, mean gestational age 30.2 weeks, mean birth weight 1276 g, were studied at age 5 years. Children with severe handicaps were excluded. The percentage of children with a correctly identified developmental disturbance in the domains cognition, speech and language development, neuromotor development, and behaviour were determined.

Results: The follow up instrument classified 67% as optimal and 33% as at risk or abnormal. Of the children classified as at risk or abnormal, 60% had not been identified at earlier follow up assessments. The combined set of standardised tests identified a further 30% with mild motor, cognitive, or behavioural disturbances. The paediatrician's assessment had a specificity of 88% (95% CI 83–93%), a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 42–58%), a positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI 78–91%), and a negative predictive value of 55% (95% CI 49–61%).

Conclusions: Even after standardised and thorough assessment, paediatricians may overlook impairments for cognitive, motor, and behavioural development. Long term follow up studies that do not include detailed standardised tests for multiple domains, especially fine motor domain, may underestimate developmental problems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Battin M., Ling E. W., Whitfield M. F., Mackinnon M., Effer S. B. Has the outcome for extremely low gestational age (ELGA) infants improved following recent advances in neonatal intensive care? Am J Perinatol. 1998 Aug;15(8):469–477. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botting N., Powls A., Cooke R. W., Marlow N. Cognitive and educational outcome of very-low-birthweight children in early adolescence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998 Oct;40(10):652–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb12324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. D'Eugenío D. B., Slagle T. A., Mettelman B. B., Gross S. J. Developmental outcome of preterm infants with transient neuromotor abnormalities. Am J Dis Child. 1993 May;147(5):570–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):44–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillberg I. C., Gillberg C. Children with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders. IV: Behaviour and school achievement at age 13. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989 Feb;31(1):3–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb08406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hack Maureen, Flannery Daniel J., Schluchter Mark, Cartar Lydia, Borawski Elaine, Klein Nancy. Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 17;346(3):149–157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hadders-Algra M., Groothuis A. M. Quality of general movements in infancy is related to neurological dysfunction, ADHD, and aggressive behaviour. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999 Jun;41(6):381–391. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299000845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hadders-Algra M., Touwen B. C. Minor neurological dysfunction is more closely related to learning difficulties than to behavioral problems. J Learn Disabil. 1992 Dec;25(10):649–657. doi: 10.1177/002221949202501004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hadders-Algra Mijna. Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from a review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Aug;44(8):561–571. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201002560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hille E. T., den Ouden A. L., Bauer L., van den Oudenrijn C., Brand R., Verloove-Vanhorick S. P. School performance at nine years of age in very premature and very low birth weight infants: perinatal risk factors and predictors at five years of age. Collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age (POPS) Infants in The Netherlands. J Pediatr. 1994 Sep;125(3):426–434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83290-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jobe A. H. Predictors of outcomes in preterm infants: which ones and when? J Pediatr. 2001 Feb;138(2):153–156. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.112760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lorenz J. M. Survival of the extremely preterm infant in North America in the 1990s. Clin Perinatol. 2000 Jun;27(2):255–262. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(05)70020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCormick M. C. The outcomes of very low birth weight infants: are we asking the right questions? Pediatrics. 1997 Jun;99(6):869–876. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.6.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Powls A., Botting N., Cooke R. W., Marlow N. Motor impairment in children 12 to 13 years old with a birthweight of less than 1250 g. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Sep;73(2):F62–F66. doi: 10.1136/fn.73.2.f62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Resnick M. B., Gomatam S. V., Carter R. L., Ariet M., Roth J., Kilgore K. L., Bucciarelli R. L., Mahan C. S., Curran J. S., Eitzman D. V. Educational disabilities of neonatal intensive care graduates. Pediatrics. 1998 Aug;102(2 Pt 1):308–314. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.2.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richardson D. K., Gray J. E., Gortmaker S. L., Goldmann D. A., Pursley D. M., McCormick M. C. Declining severity adjusted mortality: evidence of improving neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4 Pt 1):893–899. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schaap A. H., Wolf H., Bruinse H. W., Smolders-de Haas H., van Ertbruggen I., Treffers P. E. School performance and behaviour in extremely preterm growth-retarded infants. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Sep;86(1):43–49. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00041-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stewart A. L., Rifkin L., Amess P. N., Kirkbride V., Townsend J. P., Miller D. H., Lewis S. W., Kingsley D. P., Moseley I. F., Foster O. Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1653–1657. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor H. G., Klein N., Schatschneider C., Hack M. Predictors of early school age outcomes in very low birth weight children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998 Aug;19(4):235–243. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199808000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Veen S., Ens-Dokkum M. H., Schreuder A. M., Verloove-Vanhorick S. P., Brand R., Ruys J. H. Impairments, disabilities, and handicaps of very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants at five years of age. The Collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants (POPS) in The Netherlands. Lancet. 1991 Jul 6;338(8758):33–36. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90015-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Verhulst F. C., Akkerhuis G. W., Althaus M. Mental health in Dutch children: (I). A cross-cultural comparison. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1985;323:1–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb10512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verhulst F. C., Berden G. F., Sanders-Woudstra J. A. Mental health in Dutch children: (II). The prevalence of psychiatric disorder and relationship between measures. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1985;324:1–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb10513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Verloove-Vanhorick S. P., Verwey R. A., Brand R., Gravenhorst J. B., Keirse M. J., Ruys J. H. Neonatal mortality risk in relation to gestational age and birthweight. Results of a national survey of preterm and very-low-birthweight infants in the Netherlands. Lancet. 1986 Jan 11;1(8472):55–57. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90713-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vohr B. R., Msall M. E. Neuropsychological and functional outcomes of very low birth weight infants. Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):202–220. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wariyar U. K., Richmond S. Morbidity and preterm delivery: importance of 100% follow-up. Lancet. 1989 Feb 18;1(8634):387–388. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91764-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wolke D. Psychological development of prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child. 1998 Jun;78(6):567–570. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.6.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wood N. S., Marlow N., Costeloe K., Gibson A. T., Wilkinson A. R. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 10;343(6):378–384. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Wassenaer A. G., Kok J. H., de Vijlder J. J., Briët J. M., Smit B. J., Tamminga P., van Baar A., Dekker F. W., Vulsma T. Effects of thyroxine supplementation on neurologic development in infants born at less than 30 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 2;336(1):21–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES