Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2003 Mar;88(3):253–257. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.3.253

General anaesthesia or conscious sedation for painful procedures in childhood cancer: the family‘s perspective

C Crock 1, C Olsson 1, R Phillips 1, G Chalkiadis 1, S Sawyer 1, D Ashley 1, S Camilleri 1, J Carlin 1, P Monagle 1
PMCID: PMC1719477  PMID: 12598395

Abstract

Background: Until recently, midazolam sedation was routinely used in our institution for bone marrow aspirates and lumbar punctures in children with cancer. It has been perceived by many doctors and nurses as being well tolerated by children and their families.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of inhalational general anaesthesia and midazolam sedation for these procedures.

Methods: A total of 96 children with neoplastic disorders, who received either inhalational general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen (GA) or sedation with oral or nasal midazolam (SED) as part of their routine preparation for procedures were studied. The experiences of these childen were examined during their current procedure and during their first ever procedure. Main outcome measures were the degree of physical restraint used on the child, and the levels of distress and pain experienced by the child during the current procedure and during the first procedure. The family‘s preference for future procedures was also determined.

Results: During 102 procedures under GA, restraint was needed on four occasions (4%) when the anaesthetic mask was first applied, minimal pain was reported, and children were reported as distressed about 25% of the time. During 80 SED procedures, restraint was required in 94%, firm restraint was required in 66%, the child could not be restrained in 14%, median pain score was 6 (scale 0 (no pain) to 6 (maximum pain)), and 90% of the parents reported distress in their child. Ninety per cent of families wanted GA for future procedures. Many families reported dissatisfaction with the sedation regime and raised concerns about the restraint used on their child.

Conclusions: This general anaesthetic regime minimised the need for restraint and was associated with low levels of pain and distress. The sedation regime, by contrast, was much less effective. There was a significant disparity between the perceptions of health professionals and those of families with respect to how children coped with painful procedures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailey P. L., Pace N. L., Ashburn M. A., Moll J. W., East K. A., Stanley T. H. Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiology. 1990 Nov;73(5):826–830. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199011000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes C., Downie P., Chalkiadis G., Camilleri S., Monagle P., Waters K. Sedation practices for Australian and New Zealand paediatric oncology patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Apr;38(2):170–172. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2002.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bieri D., Reeve R. A., Champion G. D., Addicoat L., Ziegler J. B. The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties. Pain. 1990 May;41(2):139–150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins P. Restraining children for painful procedures. Paediatr Nurs. 1999 Apr;11(3):14–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher D. M., Robinson S., Brett C. M., Perin G., Gregory G. A. Comparison of enflurane, halothane, and isoflurane for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in children with malignancies. Anesthesiology. 1985 Dec;63(6):647–650. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198512000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hain R. D., Campbell C. Invasive procedures carried out in conscious children: contrast between North American and European paediatric oncology centres. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jul;85(1):12–15. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hain W. R., Tomlinson J. H., Barbor P. R. Anaesthesia for minor procedures in children with malignant disease. J R Soc Med. 1985 Sep;78(9):715–720. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hertzog J. H., Dalton H. J., Anderson B. D., Shad A. T., Gootenberg J. E., Hauser G. J. Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):742–747. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jay S. M., Elliott C. H., Ozolins M., Olson R. A., Pruitt S. D. Behavioral management of children's distress during painful medical procedures. Behav Res Ther. 1985;23(5):513–520. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(85)90098-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jay S., Elliott C. H., Fitzgibbons I., Woody P., Siegel S. A comparative study of cognitive behavior therapy versus general anesthesia for painful medical procedures in children. Pain. 1995 Jul;62(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00216-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jayabose S., Levendoglu-Tugal O., Giamelli J., Grodin W., Cohn M., Sandoval C., Ozkaynak F., Kubal K., Nosetti M., Uman J. Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001 Jun-Jul;23(5):290–293. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200106000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kanagasundaram S. A., Lane L. J., Cavalletto B. P., Keneally J. P., Cooper M. G. Efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide in alleviating pain and anxiety during painful procedures. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jun;84(6):492–495. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.6.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz E. R., Kellerman J., Siegel S. E. Behavioral distress in children with cancer undergoing medical procedures: developmental considerations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1980 Jun;48(3):356–365. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.48.3.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kazak A. E., Penati B., Brophy P., Himelstein B. Pharmacologic and psychologic interventions for procedural pain. Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):59–66. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ljungman G., Gordh T., Sörensen S., Kreuger A. Lumbar puncture in pediatric oncology: conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001 Mar;36(3):372–379. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maxwell L. G., Yaster M. The myth of conscious sedation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Jul;150(7):665–667. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170320011001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sandler E. S., Weyman C., Conner K., Reilly K., Dickson N., Luzins J., McGorray S. Midazolam versus fentanyl as premedication for painful procedures in children with cancer. Pediatrics. 1992 Apr;89(4 Pt 1):631–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sievers T. D., Yee J. D., Foley M. E., Blanding P. J., Berde C. B. Midazolam for conscious sedation during pediatric oncology procedures: safety and recovery parameters. Pediatrics. 1991 Dec;88(6):1172–1179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smalley A. Needle phobia. Paediatr Nurs. 1999 Mar;11(2):17–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weisman S. J., Bernstein B., Schechter N. L. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Feb;152(2):147–149. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeltzer L., LeBaron S. Hypnosis and nonhypnotic techniques for reduction of pain and anxiety during painful procedures in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr. 1982 Dec;101(6):1032–1035. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80040-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES